Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SURBL as RHSBL

2004-11-23 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
I would rather not add six new tests to my config. Would you recommend a single SURBL test? Which one seems to work better? Regards, Jason - Original Message - From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:02 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blackice

2004-11-19 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
Could be a DNS issue. Make sure that you can perform DNS lookups from that box since you've set your settings to paranoid in BI. Jason - Original Message - From: "Dan Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:36 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]

[Declude.JunkMail] Spam Bounty Hunters...?

2004-06-30 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5326107/ --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives ca

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages slipping through JM

2004-06-29 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
ely, Grant Griffith EI8HT LEGS Enhanced Web Management A Division of ETC http://www.getafreewebsite.com 877-483-3393 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason @ AreaTech Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 4:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declud

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages slipping through JM

2004-06-29 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
- Original Message - From: "Grant Griffith - Declude JM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 4:19 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages slipping through JM > Why not use the command in Declude to do this directly? In looking at the > manual it

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages slipping through JM

2004-06-29 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
- Original Message - From: "Ken Weise" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 4:16 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages slipping through JM > If this was forwarded from another account, it would skip the IMail rule. I > just went through that, wh

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Messages slipping through JM

2004-06-29 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
Sorry Scott, should have been more clear. We don't do a declude Hold at Weight20, we do a warn, and then I have a rule in Imail (7.15) that sends anything with "WEIGHT20" to a spambox submailbox. Here are the JM logs: [trunc] 06/29/2004 14:49:58 Qc7df09da00840372 L1 Message OK 06/29/2004 14:49:5

[Declude.JunkMail] Messages slipping through JM

2004-06-29 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
We have had a many e-mails showing up as of late that have no subject/body. Further investigation shows that these messages are far above our hold weight. The latest one I've received has a subject, but no body. Here are the headers from the message: Received: from host107-183.pool80181.interbus

[Declude.JunkMail] nospamproxy

2004-06-06 Thread Jason @ AreaTech
Anyone here try using Nospamproxy? Looks promising http://www.nospamproxy.de Please let me know. Jason --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail