Great script, very useful. I'm scheduling it to run on our logs every
day and email it to support, I do the same thing with the declude log
file report.
Cheers
Jools
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:15:52 -0400, you wrote:
>For anyone who wants this, here's a new script that will sort your
>delude log f
Ok, I'll add a minimum number in to help in this case.
Cheers
Jools
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 08:51:16 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Here's another email with a problem, the comments test has been fired
>>but there is no html portion, there are >file that seems to be triggering it.
>>
>>Is it possible to mak
Thanks Scott, I'll try the weightrange option!
Cheers
Jools
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:01:33 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>This is a weird one, I've setup 2 weights in global.cfg as:
>>
>>WEIGHT15weight x x 15 0
>>WEIGHT30weight x x 30 0
>
This is a weird one, I've setup 2 weights in global.cfg as:
WEIGHT15weight x x 15 0
WEIGHT30weight x x 30 0
and use in global.cfg and $default$.junkmail:
WEIGHT30ROUTETO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEIGHT15ROUTETO [EMAIL P
I guess you would do checks on the negative weights first and then the
positive and at any point a test goes above the threshold you would
stop. Unless by adding all the positive tests together it would still
be below threshold whereas you wouldn't need to do any positive tests
(unlikely though).
Hi,
This email caused 5 COMMENTS to be caught even though there is no HTML
in the email as the attachment text has
To: "Kate Priddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FW: Orange Print
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:53:41 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
The difference with us is that we are mainly handling our own companys
mail with a few small clients, our traffic is quite low so we can
afford to look at our routeto mailbox fairly often.
False positives (if there are any) are forwarded to the original
recipient, otherwise they are binned.
We al
That would be nice, I'm surprised by their undocumented methods
though. My dealings with them have been quite good as they delisted
our old server very quickly after several people submitted a mailing
of ours.
It's a wonder that more people don't submit mail maliciously if the
system works as it a
This is waht Spamcop have to say about how their system works:
http://mailsc.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/297.html
look at number 7 especially:
7. If a host has only 1 SUBE report against it, it will not be listed.
(SUBE is Supposed Unsolicited Bulk Mail)
We are quite aggressive in blocking spam
But, to block a server at Spamcop it must be reported several times,
this is obviously to stop people from being nasty and getting servers
blocked that they don't like.
Jools
On Thu, 29 May 2003 19:05:16 -0700, you wrote:
>Sorry. I am tired and hot. It has been a long week. I did not catch on to
10 matches
Mail list logo
