itched to online forums
DC> years ago, which effectively killed the list.
DC> Darin.
DC> -Original Message-----
DC> From: andyb@thumpernet
DC> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2012 6:03 PM
DC> To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
DC> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] abused whitelist
Hi,
I think you're sending this to the wrong place. Who/what company are
you looking for?
Thanks,
Andrew Baldwin
an...@thumpernet.com
an...@thumpernet.com
315-277-0685
Monday, October 22, 2012, 2:54:29 PM, you wrote:
IA>
IA>
IA>
IA>
IA>
IA> Hi,
IA>
IA>
IA>
IA>
IA>
IA> We have a client that
David,
This email was sent to the wrong Andy...
Thanks,
Andy Baldwin
From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:09 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: re: [Declude.JunkMail] FW: [049-0F7F8DF6-BE66] Invalid ZIP
interested
thanks, andy
- Original Message -
From:
Bud
Durland
To: Declude List
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 8:58
AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New
test
I am testing a small external test program. A message
fails the test if there is an discernable IP
Scott,
Is PREWHITELIST explained somewhere in more detail?
Thanks,
Andy
Thumpernet
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting & SPF
>
> >I'm getting a lot of
OpenSRS is $10/yr
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Graveen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation
> We use DirectNic - $15.00 per year/domain. Easy to administer all you
I use OpenSRS
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 2:04 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation
I use BulkRegister.com
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eS
uter. And is advertising one of three
domain names.
The general consensus is that you shouldn't WHITELIST on any easily forged
text, including the Habeas warrant. Check the archive in the last few days
for this list for more discussion and sample configurations that have
shared.
http://www.ma
I have been reporting as they come up.
Thanks, Andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
>
> >I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of H
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb
> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisted
>
>
> HI,
>
> I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of
> HABEAS... Here are the headers.
>
> These
HI,
I'm getting spam, and it is being whitelisted because of HABEAS... Here are
the headers.
These emails are definately spam. Looks like HABEAS has been compromised?
Comments Please.
thanks, Andy
Received: from cs78191007.pp.htv.fi [62.78.191.7] by thumpernet.com
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A0E1130
Hi,
When my customers send email that is undeliverable, a lot of the returned
undeliverable messages are being caught as spam. Any suggestions for
changes that will allow it will go through?
failing SPAMHEADERS and BADHEADERS, IPNOTINMX, WEIGHT10 (action HOLD)
Thanks, Andy
---
[This E-mail w
That is way too broad and general a statement.
My server doesn't NOT allow most spam to pass.
I would think most mail admins that would take advantage
> of WOT would already have their servers setup so they would pass most spam
> tests anyways. Why whitelist senders that wouldn't have failed y
Well,
Your try it
if it doesn't work, or gets abused, you get rid of it..
It just *might* help.
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Bramble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust
> I'm with To
Title: Message
Is there any way to get this to only log
hits? It is logging everything now, from what I can see.
I've read the on-line doc, in one place it says it
assigns a 1, 100 or a 0 for declude.
I'm not sure how it is working with the weighting
system... I just need to simply blac
I think WOT could be very worth while for the 10-15 minutes it takes to
setup.
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Web-o-Trust
>
> >Scott, I looked into this sev
HI,
Is there a way to block email from a specific
email address, or only one of my customers?
Thanks, Andy
very nice addition to our spam arsenal.
>
> Bill
> - Original Message -
> From: "andyb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 1:36 PM
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] sniffer
>
>
> > I
Hi,
I'm using SPAMCOP as part of the weighting system and as a HOLD action by
itself.
Because of this, In spamreview it shows a total WEIGHT but SPAMCOP isn't
listed, though I know it added to the WEIGHT because of the spamlog.
I take it that's just how it is? IS there a way to have it show in
Is sniffer worth the $300/year?
Thinking about trying it.
Thanks, andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscrib
Hi,
I noticed this test in my config file, but there are no longer in the
Declude default config files...
Are they still valid tests?
Thanks, Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. T
n on each of these ranges separately.
>
> Please note: "s" suffix is for adding to the subject a note and the r is
> for other actions.
>
> Regards,
> Kami
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf O
Hi,
Can I make a test (like SPAMCOP) be included in the weighting system, but
also be a HOLD action by itself?
So, if it fails SPAMCOP it will be held, but if the total wieght exceeds the
DELETE threshold, it will be deleted.
Thanks, Andy
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Vir
Would anyone care to post an example so I can see the math? I still don't
get how to use IPNOTINMX properly.
Thanks, andy
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 1:24 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMai
Ok,
But there is only one email server...I think the weird thing is that of the
20 virtual domains and 500 or so email boxes, this is only happening for
this *one* email address
Did you see anything else wrong in my config files?
Thanks, andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Per
;. You
>may be using XINHEADER.)
>
>Also, how about taking apart the rest of the log and your config files and
>adding up the math manually?
>
>Andrew 8)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: andyb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 11:51 AM
>
Hi,
I sent the config files ot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting
>
> >1.76i6
> >
> >I'm only running one ema
I have the weight10 set to HOLD at 7
weight20 test set to DELETE at 14
weight10 and weight20 are just labels, that's all
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] holding
1.76i6
I'm only running one email server.
Do you want me to send me my config files ( I do have a support contract).
Thank, Andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Junk
I'm looking at Weight of 18 reaches or exceeds the limit of 10.
It it is 18, it also exceeds 14, the limit I delete at
Thanks, andy
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 2:29 PM
Subject: RE: [D
In $junkmail$.junkmail
I have
WEIGHT10HOLD
WEIGHT20DELETE
All of the other tests are WARN.
In Global.cfg
all tests are WARN.
Is that correct? Still, the issue seems to be confined to this one
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL
Yes, they correspond. I checked the name, Q8b540ec.SMD, etc. Same in both
spam review and the log file. That's how I found the specific log file
entry.
This is only happening for this one email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks, Andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAI
e-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb
> > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 8:26 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] holding not deleting
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I hav
Hi,
I have one customer that has a virtual domain. Even though this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is receiving email that exceeds my DELETE threshold,
the messagages are only being HELD.
Any idea why this is happening? I don't have any special rules setup for
this customer under Declude that I can find.
T
All this conversation about betas/releases, etc.
Scott, you have the patience of a saint at times.
Do what you think is best. You can never keep everyone happy all the time.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Nov
Scott,
Is there a summary of the new tests, what they do and how to use them? It's
almost like there needs to be class to go to, for setting up filters.
Today I discovered that some of the adjustments I've made to config files
were catching legitimate list serv mailand so it goes. Is there
Thanks everyone, I have it working. It was
also necessary to go to the $defualt$.junkmail config file and add MYFILTER WARN
so I could see the results in spam review.
Thanks, Andy
Hi Matt,
I realize catching spam is like trying to hit a moving target...I spend
more time dealing with email issues than everything else as an ISP
combined.
Declude is catching 100's of these daily but only as a HOLD (with a
weight of 10) with my current configs. The goal is to add a
I believe my confusion is that all of the other tests are listed as
x x 5 0
And this one only has one X
It appears that is because for the MYFILTER test,
c:\Imail\declude\myfilter.txt is used in place of the first x?
Thanks for the help.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perr
So, the line
MYFILTER filter C:\IMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x x 5 0
should have 2 x's because of the 2 tiered weighting system I'm using?
Thanks,
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 7:13 PM
Subje
003 6:03 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] one more try...
> Filter file.
>
> MAILFROM (weighttoadd) STARTSWITH b.
>
> John Tolmachoff
> Engineer/Consultant/Owner
> eServices For You
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude
Hi all,
I've asked a couple of times over the past couple of weeks, but thought I'd
ask one more time...
I get a lot of spam with return addresses that start with b.
ie: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anyway to filter that in declude or in the Imail kill list?
Thanks, Andy
---
[This E-mail was sc
HI,
Is there a way to delete all incoming emails that begin with (for example)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get hundreds of these [EMAIL PROTECTED] .com emails and they are all spam.
Also, same for bounce*.*
Thanks, ANdy
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Scott..
Wow, that changes a lot. I knew something was going on with Verisign. Is
there a technical description somewhere of what they did so I can catch up?
Do you have new default config files listed on your website that incorporate
the latest changes needed.
Once again, the support of the pr
How do I white list all of my IP
addresses?
The line I had in there is not
working.
thanks, andy
Title: eBay - scam..
Is everyone getting bombed by spam, or is it just
me?
CPU usage was at 100%, caused by multiple
declude.exe processes running. I rebooted, cleared the queue and it seems
to be OK now.
Never had any issues until a couple of days
ago.
Andy
- Original Message
Yes, that part I already have.
But I already have WEIGHT10 HOLD and WEIGHT20 DELETE
What is the syntax for getting the weight in the subject line?
thanks, andy
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:08 PM
Can you give me the syntax for that?
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam review
>
> > How do I get the Weight: to show?
>
> Andy,
>
> It's not the answer but
Couple of question:
How do I get the Weight: to show? I have it
setup (as far as I can tell) according to the Spam Review help section.
Does this feature work? What's the trick?
Also, I've tried to do the update to the latest
version, but it just exits out of Spam Review and the versio
ote addresses.
>
> I asked the question a couple of weeks earlier.
>
> Kevin Bilbee
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of andyb
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:28 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
In the log file, what does this mean?
06/03/2003 16:22:12 Q036a29a R1 Message OK
06/03/2003 16:22:12 Q036a29a R2 Message OK
06/03/2003 16:22:12 Q036a29a R3 Message OK
06/03/2003 16:22:12 Q036a29a R4 Message OK
06/03/2003 16:22:12 Q036a29a R5 Message OK
06/03/2003 16:22:12 Q036a29a R6 Message OK
06
al Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of andyb
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 10:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] yahoo as spam
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a customer, she is sending em
> Hi,
>
> I have a customer, she is sending email from her yahoo account to her
email
> address here. It is being caught as spam, as per included log entries.
>
> Good ole yahoo, not RFC compliant as the postmaster and abuse email
> addresses.
>
> I have also included my config files. This config
What's the difference between spamcheck and declude?
- Original Message -
From: "Frederick P. Squib, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2003 7:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spamcheck
> Tom,
> http://www.riedmann.it/spamchk/
>
> Been using
-
From:
andyb
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:55
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] MSN
Hi,MSN is not accepting email from my mail server,
here is what the log fileentries look like:20030312 001347
127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) Trying
Hi,
MSN is not accepting email from my mail server, here is what the log file
entries look like:
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) Trying msn.com (0)
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP (259) Connect msn.com
[207.46.181.13:25] (1)
20030312 001347 127.0.0.1 SMTP (259)
20030312 0013
mail 'user specific specific file
>
>
> Declude Pro only.
>
> I think this is what you implied!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of andyb
> Sent: 15 January 2003 17:46
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
Hi,
I'm sure this has been answered before...
How do I exclude one user from the spam filter?
If you could head me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it.
thanks, Andrew
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declu
That is a bummer, I'm using xcopy to backup files from one computer to
another, and the hold directly can have as many as 3000 messages over the
weekend (which is big plug for the effectiveness of declude)
thanks, andy
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[
Is there a way to change the location of HOLD messages from the default?
Thanks, andrew
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
60 matches
Mail list logo
