RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-05 Thread Katie La Salle-Lowery
50 PM To: DLAnalyzer Support Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003 Build I have is: 11.5608.5606 (release build) Scott Monday, November 3, 2003, 1:13:32 PM, you wrote: DLAnalyzer> Is anyone else compensating for this with a filter? DLAnalyzer> HEADERS -3

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread Scott Winberg
Build I have is: 11.5608.5606 (release build) Scott Monday, November 3, 2003, 1:13:32 PM, you wrote: DLAnalyzer> Is anyone else compensating for this with a filter? DLAnalyzer> HEADERS -3 CONTAINS X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0 DLAnalyzer> Has anyone else seen any di

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> It's a novel idea, and I have been thinking about how to best integrate > other ANTI-filters for such things, but there is always a danger of > crediting back points for something that isn't verifiably going to fail > such a test. Worse yet, this one X-Mailer header will no doubt be > copied by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread Matthew Bramble
It's a novel idea, and I have been thinking about how to best integrate other ANTI-filters for such things, but there is always a danger of crediting back points for something that isn't verifiably going to fail such a test. Worse yet, this one X-Mailer header will no doubt be copied by spamme

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
2:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003 > > Is anyone else compensating for this with a filter? > > HEADERS -3CONTAINS X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0 > > Has anyone else seen any different builds? The

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Is anyone else compensating for this with a filter? HEADERS -3 CONTAINS X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0 Has anyone else seen any different builds? The build below should be the release build. X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Darrell

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread Tyler Jensen
Mine is 11.5608.5606 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of DLAnalyzer Support Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 3:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 420e with Outlook 2003 Is anyone else compensating for this with a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
Good morning, I just started using Outlook 2003 and I am now failing the Spamheader test with code Code: 420e. The E-mail failed the SPAMHEADERS test. This is due to a bug in Outlook 2003 -- I'm not aware of a Microsoft fix for it yet. -Sc

[Declude.JunkMail] 4000020e with Outlook 2003

2003-11-03 Thread Tyler Jensen
Good morning, I just started using Outlook 2003 and I am now failing the Spamheader test with code Code: 420e. The E-mail failed the SPAMHEADERS test. This E-mail is missing a Message-ID: header. Although it is legal not to have one, the RFCs say that E-mails SHOULD have this (which, i