Interestingly, I've found that not having a way to block email so encoded has forced
me to focus on non message body based triggers for my tests, resulting in tests that
are more robust all around. I will of course, embrace everything that makes such
encoding transparent, but I'm actually glad
Latest Beta? What is the release number?
According to http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm , the latest beta
is 1.67.
Currently wee have 1.67i3.
Then you have this functionality already, as you are running an interim
release after the 1.67 beta.
-Scott
PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BASE64? PLEASE...
>You once said you are thinking of adding Base64 parsing capability to
>Declude.
>
>Has that moved in the priorities?
>
>Addi
> It is also important to remember that for every false positive we've seen
> on the BASE64 test, there was no legitimate reason for the base64 encoding
> to be used, and those legitimate E-mails were wasting bandwidth, storage
> space, and resources.
>
> People who send out legitimate E-mail with
You once said you are thinking of adding Base64 parsing capability to Declude.
Has that moved in the priorities?
Adding this to Declude would truly make it a perfect spam killing
machine... & not having it with the ever more usage of it is causing more
spams to come through.
With Base64 our
Title: Message
Scott:
You once said you
are thinking of adding Base64 parsing capability to Declude.
Has that moved in
the priorities?
Adding this to
Declude would truly make it a perfect spam killing machine... & not having
it with the ever more usage of it is causing more spams to co
