Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-27 Thread Matt
Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam? That is correct, declude virus processes before junkmail I did look at quite a few zip viruses and didnt see any o

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-27 Thread Mark E. Smith
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson > Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:33 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing > legit email flagged as spam? > > That

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-27 Thread Rick Davidson
: "Mark E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 1:03 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam? Rick, I was looking at your filter -- great idea. One question (which falls under th

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
One question (which falls under the processing order) If you have: BODYSTOPALLTESTS CONTAINS Content-Type: application/x-zip-compressed I think Declude Virus will still grab this correct? Declude Virus runs first. So in this case, Declude Virus would scan the E-mail -- and Declude JunkMail w

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-27 Thread Bill Landry
- Original Message - From: "Mark E. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Rick, > I was looking at your filter -- great idea. > One question (which falls under the processing order) > > If you have: > BODY STOPALLTESTS CONTAINS Content-Type: application/x-zip-compressed > > I think Declude Virus w

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-27 Thread Mark E. Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Davidson > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:49 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing > legit email flagged as spam? > > >1 in 500,000? That's fantast

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-26 Thread Rick Davidson
1 in 500,000? That's fantastic. I think that qualifies for the anti-spam guru of the week award! heh, that is no exageration either, it is mainly due to spending alot of time in looking at false positives and finding ways to prevent them. For example use filtering to look for legit mail, the a

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-26 Thread Chris Ulrich
and fewer false positives This is how I do it. Rick Davidson National Systems Manager North American Title Group - - Original Message - From: "Chris Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 10:37 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] B

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-26 Thread Chris Ulrich
The reason it is called BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST is just that. Bounce only if you MUST and be aware of what you are doing. So what do you recommend to help avoid losing false-positives while still catching the crap? We all know that people will get false positives. How it is handled after that is th

Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-25 Thread Darin Cox
in. - Original Message - From: "Charles Frolick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 12:12 PM Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam? Hello Darin, Mo

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-25 Thread Charles Frolick
Hello Darin, Monday, October 25, 2004, 10:22:11 AM, you wrote: DC> We're working on an independent version of SpamReview that has more DC> information and adjustments capabilities built in, but there are two DC> existing freeware products on the Declude Utilities page: SpamReview being a DC> desk

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-25 Thread Darin Cox
From: "Chris Ulrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 10:37 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam? Hi all. We've been struggling a bit with this issue. We have a variety of te

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-25 Thread Rick Davidson
2004 10:37 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam? Hi all. We've been struggling a bit with this issue. We have a variety of tests in place, and basically have just changed our settings to: WEIGHT10 WARN WEIGHT20 BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST WEIGHT40 DELE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-25 Thread Bonno Bloksma
Hi, > Hi all. We've been struggling a bit with this issue. We have a variety of > tests in place, and basically have just changed our settings to: > > WEIGHT10 WARN > WEIGHT20 BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST > WEIGHT40 DELETE > > The hope is that it will bounce some of the false positives back to the > send

[Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices for handing legit email flagged as spam?

2004-10-25 Thread Chris Ulrich
Hi all. We've been struggling a bit with this issue. We have a variety of tests in place, and basically have just changed our settings to: WEIGHT10WARN WEIGHT20BOUNCEONLYIFYOUMUST WEIGHT40DELETE The hope is that it will bounce some of the false positives back to the sen