RE: [Declude.JunkMail] COMMENTS test needs adjusting?

2003-06-05 Thread R. Scott Perry
I think you need to skip attachments or at least make it an option in the CFG file. That's something that we are looking into. Note, however, that few anti-spam programs have full MIME support in them (Ipswitch doesn't for example). MIME decoding is very complex (it took Ipswitch years to get

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] COMMENTS test needs adjusting?

2003-06-05 Thread Kevin Bilbee
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 5:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COMMENTS test needs adjusting? >This email caused 5 COMMENTS to be caught even though there is no HTML >in the email

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COMMENTS test needs adjusting?

2003-06-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
This email caused 5 COMMENTS to be caught even though there is no HTML in the email as the attachment text has Very interesting -- that's the first time I've ever seen a .PDF file that was encoded in a way that was still human readable. We are getting close to the point where we may add full MIM

[Declude.JunkMail] COMMENTS test needs adjusting?

2003-06-04 Thread Jools Chesters
Hi, This email caused 5 COMMENTS to be caught even though there is no HTML in the email as the attachment text has To: "Kate Priddle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: FW: Orange Print Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 10:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;