RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-03 Thread Stanley Lyzak
+ Network Security Engineer ASysTech, Inc. -Original Message- From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem > >OK Further investigation shows deccon.exe IS runni

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> >OK Further investigation shows deccon.exe IS running (so says the taks > >manager) however, there is nothing showing up on the desktop. Weird eh? > > Are you using Terminal Services (which doesn't seem to have any way to > display the default desktop)? Speaking of this, is anyone running Imail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
OK Further investigation shows deccon.exe IS running (so says the taks manager) however, there is nothing showing up on the desktop. Weird eh? Are you using Terminal Services (which doesn't seem to have any way to display the default desktop)? -

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread Timm Jasper
> >Nope, just shut down the services, ran the patch and restarted the server. > >(It didnt say it had to, but it IS a Windows machine) > > Do the Declude log files show any errors? > > -Scott OK Further investigation shows deccon.exe IS running (

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
> Do the Declude log files show any errors? > --- None that I can see. Would the error be obvious? It should be -- I was expecting something like lines of "Could not start console" or "Invalid activation code" for each E-mail that is received. Is the \IMail\Deccon.exe file there?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread Timm Jasper
> Do the Declude log files show any errors? > > -Scott > --- None that I can see. Would the error be obvious? --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses at tqci.net] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.c

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Nope, just shut down the services, ran the patch and restarted the server. (It didnt say it had to, but it IS a Windows machine) Do the Declude log files show any errors? -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread Timm Jasper
>Did the Imail directory change? Nope, just shut down the services, ran the patch and restarted the server. (It didnt say it had to, but it IS a Windows machine) --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses at tqci.net] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> Declude Console stopped working after the 8.01 Imail Upgrade (Pro). The mail > is getting through the server and is being commented by Declude. I did not > change anything else. I even tried bumping up to 1.70 beta, still no > console. The line in the global and virus .cfg files should read 'Cons

[Declude.JunkMail] Console Problem

2003-07-02 Thread Timm Jasper
Declude Console stopped working after the 8.01 Imail Upgrade (Pro). The mail is getting through the server and is being commented by declude. I did not change anything else. I even tried bumping up to 1.70 beta, still no console. The line in the global and virus .cfg files should read 'Console On'

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Charles Frolick
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question > I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to Terminal > Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be > wrong though)?

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> I thought Win2003 was supposed to have added console access to Terminal > Services (I have some recollection that you are running 2003, could be > wrong though)? If you are not running 2003, just install VNC for the > occasions you need console access. That's what I had to do. I was using Windo

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Charles Frolick
re it out. Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question >Along that same l

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-26 Thread Charles Frolick
olick ArgoNet, Inc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 6:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question > >If the console is not being used

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
Along that same line then, as has been discussed before, any thought to changing deccon.exe so as to be able to access from other than the console, and other than the lengthy work around we discussed last year but that I have not had the time to try yet? The problem is that it must run when the sy

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> >If the console is not being used at all, how does Hijack keep track of IP > >addresses? > > It does not. Without the Declude console running, Declude Hijack will not > work. However, if the \IMail\Deccon.exe file exists, then it will > automatically get started by Declude Hijack as needed. T

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-25 Thread R. Scott Perry
If the console is not being used at all, how does Hijack keep track of IP addresses? It does not. Without the Declude console running, Declude Hijack will not work. However, if the \IMail\Deccon.exe file exists, then it will automatically get started by Declude Hijack as needed.

[Declude.JunkMail] Console and Hijack question

2003-06-25 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
If the console is not being used at all, how does Hijack keep track of IP addresses? If the console is not being used, how can HOLD2 be cleared other than restarting the computer? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com --- [This E-mail was scann

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] console question (yet again)

2002-08-15 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Logic dictates that since there are more tests for a message to fail that >there should be a higher percentage of messages showing up as SPAM now >than there was before. I can only come up with 2 theories. > >Theory1 - Some spammers now realize their SPAM is not getting through and >have sin

[Declude.JunkMail] console question (yet again)

2002-08-15 Thread Stic.Net
In the last two days I have added several ip4r tests to my global.cfg and def.jm files, added 2 fromfile blacklist tests, and bumped up the weight of a few tests that were already there. This seems to have significantly cut down on the amount of spam getting through without catching much more

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Console

2002-07-12 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Someone mentioned earlier that there was a way to invoke declude to >spawn a console in order to see what's happening in real time. Is this >correct and how do you invoke this? The Declude Console was designed primarily for use with Declude Hijack, but can be used with the other Declude progr

[Declude.JunkMail] Console

2002-07-12 Thread Darrell LaRock
Someone mentioned earlier that there was a way to invoke declude to spawn a console in order to see what's happening in real time. Is this correct and how do you invoke this? Darrell --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came fro