Does this mean the idea might get included ?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Enchancment suggestion
I was reading another thread
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Enchancment suggestion
I was reading another thread that digressed into the topic about the
difficulty of keeping up with the latest .cfg file while maintaining
the mail administrator s customized .cfg
I would like to suggest that perhaps
That reminds medoes the activation need to be at the top? I've been
considering re-arranging the cfg to have all of my changes at the
bottom.
No, the activation code does not need to be on the top. It can go anywhere
in the file.
Does this mean the idea might get included ?
It is
Title: Enchancment suggestion
I was reading another thread that digressed into the topic about the difficulty of keeping up with the latest .cfg file while maintaining the mail administrators customized .cfg
I would like to suggest that perhaps a different approach to managing the .cfg
I was reading another thread that digressed into the topic about the
difficulty of keeping up with the latest .cfg file while maintaining the
mail administrator s customized .cfg
I would like to suggest that perhaps a different approach to managing the
.cfg files could be implemented. It
While we're working on config files, how about per-domain virus configs?
hint, hint...grin
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Enchancment suggestion
I
