RE: Re[2]: [SPAM-BADHEADERS][Declude.JunkMail] Five Ten List

2003-09-25 Thread Keith Anderson
Yeah, we're aware of that one also. And other than one glitch in receiving mail, we haven't experienced any problems receiving mail (with one exception below). Of course, you never know when you don't receive something unless it was sent by someone important. The only company that we're aware o

Re[2]: [SPAM-BADHEADERS][Declude.JunkMail] Five Ten List

2003-09-25 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: Keith Anderson Re: [SPAM-BADHEADERS][Declude.JunkMail] Five Ten List on Thursday 9:14:19 AM We used to be on Qwest and had the same problem. Outgoing was not a problem, but incoming was. The worst we saw of an RBL blocking whole providers was BLARS which appears to block whole

RE: [SPAM-BADHEADERS][Declude.JunkMail] Five Ten List

2003-09-25 Thread Keith Anderson
One of our upstream providers is Qwest, and we have the same problem. However, everyone seems to be aware of the SPAM-SUPPORT flaw because it has never prevented us from getting mail to anyone. > My server is blocked by five-ten because the author doesn't > like Broadwing? I am immediately going

[Declude.JunkMail] Five Ten List

2003-09-25 Thread Doug McKee
My server is blocked by five-ten because the author doesn't like Broadwing? I am immediately going to quit using the five-ten lists because I don't know who else this gentleman doesn't like. The response is: IP address 67.99.44.6 is listed here as broadwing.net spam-support. Please note that t