27, 2008 11:50 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6
>
>
> I know about pricing
> But was just wondering about technical aspect did anyone test it ?
> Regards
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michae
I know about pricing
But was just wondering about technical aspect
did anyone test it ?
Regards
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Thomas - Mathbox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 9:00 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6
Serge,
Fri
ED] On
> Behalf Of Serge
> Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 3:31 PM
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
> Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 6
>
> I curently use only the built in virus scanner
> But I'm just curious, anyone tested Fpscan from fprot6 ? and
> what command line o
I curently use only the built in virus scanner
But I'm just curious, anyone tested Fpscan from fprot6 ? and what command line
options needs to be used ?
TIA
Serge
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "u
Updating for a network of 100 machines is a different story, but when
running one copy on a Declude server, there is no advantage to using
FTP. Over a year ago, the updater service would hang when F-Prot's
servers were overwhelmed. This was just bad programming on their part,
and I haven't se
I disagree that using the updater app is a better solution over using FTP
scripts (yes, I'm current on licensing).
I have 100 machines running fprot and every machine updates four times
daily. I have one machine set to download the definitions via an FTP
script and then all the other machines
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot def updates
> Serge,
>
> This doesn't directly answer your question, but this might be some
> help. I think that the general consensus around here is that paying for
> the li
Serge,
This doesn't directly answer your question, but this might be some
help. I think that the general consensus around here is that paying for
the licensed version is the best way to go since it gets you the faster
32-bit command line app instead of the 16-bit one that the free version
ha
Hi all
I was using scripts to download fprot def
I use to download fp-def.zip and macrdef2.zip
I just noticed these file are no longer on their ftp
anyone else having this problem ?
TIA
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTE
Nope.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: "Doris Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot
I have been having this problem as well ... if I make the change do I have
to re
I have been having this problem as well ... if I make the change do I have
to reboot or stop and start anything ???
TIA
Doris
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 1:22 PM
Subject: Re: [D
>> If you switch to fpcmd.exe (changing "F-Prot.exe" to "fpcmd.exe" in the
>> SCANFILE line in your \IMail\Declude\virus.cfg file, and removing
>> "/NOFLOPPY" from that line), it will take care of the problem. F-Prot.exe
>> is a 16-bit process, which needs to use NTVDM, whereas fpcmd.exe is a
>> 3
virus scanner 1.
> > 03/10/2004 08:46:36 Q2a4000b700e8a069 Scanned: Error in virus scanner.
>
> Don
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adrian Titei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:00 PM
> Sub
in virus scanner.
Don
- Original Message -
From: "Adrian Titei" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fprot 3.14d
> Hey Serge,
>
> I've downloaded and tested it with the de
Hey Serge,
I've downloaded and tested it with the declude/tools and it seems to do
its job. The time will tell... I'll let you know if I notice anything...
Adrian
> Serge wrote:
>
> Anyone cares to test this ?
>
> FRISK Software has released version 3.14d of F-Prot Antivirus for
> Windows.
>
I'll give it a try an let you know.
Adrian
> Serge wrote:
>
> Anyone cares to test this ?
>
> FRISK Software has released version 3.14d of F-Prot Antivirus for
> Windows.
>
> In order to further increase the security and peace of mind we provide
> our customers, we have now released a new vers
I get this error very frequently. Any Help on how to fix it. Fprot site
had no information I could find.
Running windows 2000 server
Application popup: 16 bit MS-DOS Subsystem : C:\scanner\FSI\F-prot\F-Prot.exe
X#=0D, CS=01CF IP=5703. The NTVDM CPU has encountered an unhandled
exception. Cho
Anyone cares to test this ?
FRISK Software has released version 3.14d of F-Prot Antivirus for
Windows.
In order to further increase the security and peace of mind we provide our
customers, we have now released a new version of F-Prot Antivirus for Windows.
Version 3.14d of F-Prot Antivirus f
Hi Kevin,
You're using the wrong exe. Try using the 32-bit application FPCMD.EXE
as per manual:
SCANFILE C:\Progra~1\Comman~1\fpcmd.exe /TYPE /SILENT /NOMEM /ARCHIVE
/NOBOOT /DUMB /REPORT=report.txt
VIRUSCODE 3
VIRUSCODE 6
REPORTInfection:
Cheers,
Adrian
> Kevin Shimwell wrote:
>
> Off To
Off
Topic
I get this error
very frequently. Any Help on how to fix it. Fprot site had no information I
could find.
Running windows 2000
server
Application popup:
16 bit MS-DOS Subsystem : C:\scanner\FSI\F-prot\F-Prot.exeX#=0D, CS=01CF
IP=5703. The NTVDM CPU has encountered an unhand
20 matches
Mail list logo
