Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-29 Thread Bennie
Andrew... What porn filter are you using? Bennie - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 4:41 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn Today's related counts: My own Habeas filter: 17 HIL: 258

[Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Dan Geiser
Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent with the Habeas headers? --- Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group http://www.nexustechgroup.com/mailscan --- [This E-mail was scanned

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Lukasz Kaminski
Yes. Quite overwhelming actually. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 3:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
on Habeas and BondedSender entirely. So... no, I have not SEEN this. But it may show up in my logs of messages held. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Dan Geiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Jeff Kratka
] * -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Geiser Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Madscientist
Yes. At 03:45 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote: Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent with the Habeas headers? --- Sign up for virus-free and spam-free e-mail with Nexus Technology Group

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Dan Geiser
PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn Most people have stopped giving Habeas much negative weight, based on the massive abuse of their mark by a spam gang hosting their pharmacy websites in China. Habeas was very slow to populate their HIL database of known abusers to counteract

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Kami Razvan
] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn H. Maybe I shouldn't have HABEAS whitelisted then. Also, it's still whitelisted in the Declude JunkMail default GLOBAL.CFG. Thanks, Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Colbeck, Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
) -Original Message- From: Dan Geiser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn Has anybody seen the crazy amount of porn spam being sent with the Habeas headers

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Madscientist
At 04:41 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote: Today's related counts: My own Habeas filter: 17 HIL: 258 Number of my Habeas filters tripped that were in HIL: 1 Number of my Habeas filters tripped on my porn filter: 9 You know - it's probably crossed a mind or two - but it needs to be said. Is it now time to

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Bill Landry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:05 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn At 04:41 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote: Today's related counts: My own Habeas filter: 17 HIL: 258 Number of my Habeas filters tripped that were in HIL: 1 Number of my Habeas

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn

2004-02-27 Thread Matt
- Original Message - From: "Madscientist" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:05 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn At 04:41 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote: Today's related counts: My own Habeas filter: 1