: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MXRate-Allow
Andy,
I both assumed and created a group of different definitions of things for
classifying spammers things related to them. I don't claim that this list
is universal, nor complete, but when I refer to something with one of these
terms, this is generally w
:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
Behalf Of *Matt
*Sent:* Saturday, November 18, 2006 07:54 PM
*To:* declude.junkmail@declude.com
*Subject:* Re: [Declude.JunkMail] MXRate-Allow
Andy,
That result
Andy,
This address shows 481 reported false positives from actual recipients.
It also shows that 5957 individual recipients have added this address to
their Alligate whitelists.
But, it also shows that it has failed 81 tarpits and 422 greylist tests.
So the results are a little ambiguous. Ri
d there.
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 07:54 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMai
Andy,
That result code is neither a whitelist or a blacklist, it is merely an
indication that legitimate E-mail has been received in quantity from
that IP. Due to the fact that spam levels are approaching 99% of
connection traffic these days (not the same as message volume), it is
not uncomm
Is it me - or should MXRate-Allow be treated as a "spam source" list?
I don't know how many times I've looked at Spam that made it through and the
IP is on their whitelist, such as "campaigner".
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
-Ori
