I looked through a couple of days of logs and this is limited to RBL.
It is inconsistent, however. Not all RBL listings have 0.0.0.0 but
several do. The ones with and without a valid IP address all look
like SPAM. The message I sent you yesterday, however, was not SPAM
and their IP was not in t
Version 1.56. Don't have the mail. I will start holding MAPS
failures, though.
Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 6:40:28 PM, R. Scott Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I found it in the Declude log file. Please note the IP address
>>reported by Declude:
>>07/29/2002 08:06:44 Q3dda126 Msg failed RBL (
Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 6:40:28 PM, R. Scott Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I found it in the Declude log file. Please note the IP address
>>reported by Declude:
>>07/29/2002 08:06:44 Q3dda126 Msg failed RBL (This E-mail came from
>>0.0.0.0, a potential spam source listed in RBL.).
RSP>
>I found it in the Declude log file. Please note the IP address
>reported by Declude:
>07/29/2002 08:06:44 Q3dda126 Msg failed RBL (This E-mail came from
>0.0.0.0, a potential spam source listed in RBL.).
That is very odd. Which version of Declude are you running? Do you by
chance have a co
Scott,
I got a telephone call from a customer about a particular e-mail which
wasn't making the trip.
I found it in the Declude log file. Please note the IP address
reported by Declude:
07/29/2002 08:06:44 Q3dda126 Msg failed RBL (This E-mail came from 0.0.0.0, a
potential spam source listed i
