RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread Kami Razvan
: Thursday, November 13, 2003 9:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality Scott, As I continue to look for new potential in filtering, I have repeatedly come across some limitations which restrict what can be done effectively, difficulty

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
As I continue to look for new potential in filtering, I have repeatedly come across some limitations which restrict what can be done effectively, difficulty in figuring the scoring of some variable filters, and challenges from the additional processing power required to counterbalance some

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread Kami Razvan
: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality As I continue to look for new potential in filtering, I have repeatedly come across some limitations which restrict what can be done effectively, difficulty in figuring the scoring of some variable filters, and challenges from

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread George Kulman
THANK YOU Scott! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality As I continue

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread Sanford Whiteman
(IE if you have MAXWEIGHT 60, and the filter is at 55 points with a line that would add 10 points, processing would stop with a weight of 60, not 65). Sounds like any negative weighting must be frontloaded in the filter file, then? -Sandy Sanford

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
(IE if you have MAXWEIGHT 60, and the filter is at 55 points with a line that would add 10 points, processing would stop with a weight of 60, not 65). Sounds like any negative weighting must be frontloaded in the filter file, then? That is correct.

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scott, EXCELENT!!! Please note the minimum score in addition to the maximum one (I'm not sure if you got that, though it's not nearly as important). Thanks a bunch, Matt R. Scott Perry wrote: As I continue to look for new potential in filtering, I have repeatedly come across some

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scott, Elaborating is my favorite pastime :) I mentioned the minimum score choice because while most of what we do is looking for ways to add points, sometimes we also want to subtract them in order to give credit, or alternatively, we sometimes don't want to subtract more than a certain

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread R. Scott Perry
I mentioned the minimum score choice because while most of what we do is looking for ways to add points, sometimes we also want to subtract them in order to give credit, or alternatively, we sometimes don't want to subtract more than a certain number of points. So for the completeness of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-14 Thread Matthew Bramble
The MINWEIGHT option will be added, too. :) EXCELENT!!! Thanks again. It should be easy to modify the filters to work more effectively under the new features, and my eye strain will subside with the addition of weights in the headers and logs. BTW, another thought...because some of us parse

[Declude.JunkMail] Request for additional filtering functionality

2003-11-13 Thread Matthew Bramble
Scott, As I continue to look for new potential in filtering, I have repeatedly come across some limitations which restrict what can be done effectively, difficulty in figuring the scoring of some variable filters, and challenges from the additional processing power required to counterbalance