RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-30 Thread Craig Gittens
, January 24, 2003 2:09 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration From your website: Total Emails Clean = 3,464,084 Total Emails Infected = 19,565Inbound=9,556 / Outbound=10,009 Not bad, not bad! but 10,000 outgoing viri ??? What are your user's

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Craig Gittens
: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration John, From your post I gathered that your log level is atleast mid. Is this a normal configuration or just a one time deal to look at the mail. Darrell Darrell LaRock Information Systems Analyst Gannett

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Markus Gufler
, 2003 1:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration LOL My log level is MID and I run at 100MB a day. Craig. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Adam Hobach
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Gittens Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration LOL My log level is MID and I run at 100MB a day. Craig. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Markus Gufler
Individual tests like SPAMCHECK and NOXMAIL generate a number of false positives... Hi John, Can you give me some example for false positives created by SpamChk? Was they triggered from header- link- or keyword-checks? We've set SpamChk to return his own opinion as a weight to declude. So

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Keith Johnson
PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 8:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration Our logs are the 100MB each day and I had to build a log file rotator so we could open and analyze the logs a little easier. I have the log file rotator

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread John Tolmachoff
Can you give me some example for false positives created by SpamChk? Was they triggered from header- link- or keyword-checks? You want me to work, don't you? ;) As soon as I am able to, I will review the SpamCheck log and check. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Craig Gittens
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 8:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration A very interesting argument. Can you provide us some config-settings and effectivity stats about your system? We all want to have such a large

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Kris McElroy
: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration LOL My log level is MID and I run at 100MB a day. Craig. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John TolmachoffSent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 6:39 PMTo: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread John Tolmachoff
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Kris McElroy Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 7:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration My log level is set to low and yesterday I ran 130 MB? This brings me to ask a question How can I see the total number

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread David Lewis-Waller
]] On Behalf Of Kris McElroySent: 24 January 2003 15:39To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration My log level is set to low and yesterday I ran 130 MB? This brings me to ask a question How can I see the total number ofEmails that Declude processed

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread Markus Gufler
From your website: Total Emails Clean = 3,464,084 Total Emails Infected = 19,565Inbound=9,556 / Outbound=10,009 Not bad, not bad! but 10,000 outgoing viri ??? What are your user's doing? We catch only around 15 viri/day found in 2,500 incoming outgoing messages/day (0,6%) More then

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-24 Thread John Tolmachoff
24, 2003 8:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration I get them by actually analysing my Virus file since that only takes 15 mins. I get ~1% infection rate. http://www.sunbeach.net/virii_caught.cfmStats. Craig.

[Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-23 Thread John Tolmachoff
I wanted to post yesterdays results of Declude Junkmail: We hold on a weight of 20 and delete at 40. Messages held are reviewed using Spam Review software. There were no False Positives in the messages deleted. This was reviewed by manually going through the Declude Junkmail log for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration

2003-01-23 Thread Darrell L.
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Results with our configuration I wanted to post yesterdays results of Declude Junkmail: We hold on a weight of 20 and delete at 40