[Declude.JunkMail] Summary Line suppresses tests that DID fail!

2004-02-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi Scott, Now tests can be triggered and there is NO trace for that ever having happened? That can't be good, specially now that filters can be used instead of weights to process TESTSFAILED. Again, I respectfully submit that at least the SUMMARY line (the last line in the medium log) must be

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Summary Line suppresses tests that DID fail!

2004-02-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
Now tests can be triggered and there is NO trace for that ever having happened? It has always worked this way. If you don't want the tests logged, they won't be logged. That can't be good, specially now that filters can be used instead of weights to process TESTSFAILED. The filters work on all

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Summary Line suppresses tests that DID fail!

2004-02-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
I don't want to annoy you - I'm just trying to figure out why I'm having such a hard time comprehending this. The manual states: IGNORE = Does nothing (except add a log entry). Same as LOG action. LOG= The LOG action places an entry into the log file (C:\IMail\spool\dec.log by default).

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Summary Line suppresses tests that DID fail!

2004-02-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
I don't want to annoy you - I'm just trying to figure out why I'm having such a hard time comprehending this. The manual states: IGNORE = Does nothing (except add a log entry). Same as LOG action. LOG= The LOG action places an entry into the log file (C:\IMail\spool\dec.log by default).