RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-06 Thread Harry Vanderzand
PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Harry Vanderzand > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:23 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue > > I was just checking my declude directories and found mail > sitting i

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread Matt
not like something about winmail.dat attachments. Bill - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 1:16 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue Remember, changes to the declude.cfg file call for a resta

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread Bill Landry
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 1:16 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue Remember, changes to the declude.cfg file call for a restart of the Decludeproc service. John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread John T \(Lists\)
2:53 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue > > David, I made the suggested change to my declude.cfg and within 3 minutes > the orphaned .vir directories started showing up in the "work" sub-directory > and messages were being mo

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread Bill Landry
Bill - Original Message - From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:28 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue Bill, 3.0.5.12 WINSOCKCLEANUP was always ON whereas in 3.0.5.14 it is set to OFF by default, try setting WINSOC

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread David Barker
, 2005 1:18 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue I sent info to Declude support yesterday about this, but have not received a response yet. I also had to revert back to V3.0.5.12 yesterday because of this issue. Bill - Original Message - From

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread Bill Landry
1, 2005 10:09 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue The review directory has it's purpose, if there is email that causes decludeproc to crash, messages that are currently being worked on go into the review directory, if the messages continue to cause the same problem, then the messages

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread David Barker
D] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:23 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue I was just checking my declude directories and found mail sitting in the review directory. 95 pieces with varying times since my update to 30514 yest

[Declude.JunkMail] V3.05.14 issue

2005-11-01 Thread Harry Vanderzand
I was just checking my declude directories and found mail sitting in the review directory. 95 pieces with varying times since my update to 30514 yesterday. When I put them back into the proc directory the system slowed down and they ended up back in the review directory eventually. I then reverte