Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with this header?

2004-06-19 Thread R. Scott Perry
We're still running Imail 7.15 -- I have yet to see any value in upgrading to 8.x -- so is there an easy way to do the whitelisting of local accounts for IMail 7.x? In that case, you may want to consider whitelisting them based on their IPs. Also, what would you think about lowering the weight

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with this header?

2004-06-19 Thread Matt
Scott, False positives on this are rare, but not quite as rare on my systems as your stats suggest. For instance, I have the following list of exceptions that I gathered in the course of about two weeks and there is definitely more: Header indications of mailer software that fail CMDSPACE:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with this header?

2004-06-18 Thread R. Scott Perry
Normally, we expect that all the clients we host on our own mail server would get very low spam weights. However, I just recieved a message from a client with a weight of 7. I'm trying to understand why the high weight. Here is the message header: Received: from slaptop [65.75.194.49] by

[Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with this header?

2004-06-18 Thread Imail Admin
Normally, we expect that all the clients we host on our own mail server would get very low spam weights. However, I just recieved a message from a client with a weight of 7. I'm trying to understand why the high weight. Here is the message header: Received: from slaptop [65.75.194.49] by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with this header?

2004-06-18 Thread Imail Admin
Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 9:48 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] What's wrong with this header? Normally, we expect that all the clients we host on our own mail server would get very low spam weights. However, I just recieved a message from