[Declude.JunkMail] ENVFROM test

2008-02-28 Thread declude
I could not find this test in the Junkmail Manual. I have a customer who is getting false negatives with this test. I wanted to see what triggers this but could not find any documentation. Could someone please fill me in? Thanks, Don --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ENVFROM test

2008-02-28 Thread David Barker
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 12:59 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] ENVFROM test I could not find this test in the Junkmail Manual. I have a customer who

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test

2004-01-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
Then how about a test to check if the MAILFROM is syntax correct, meaning has some characters, the at sign, some characters, a period, and some more characters? This will be changed for the next release. I can't think of any other reason (aside from bounces, using ) that an address without an @

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test

2004-01-01 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 10:48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test Then how about a test to check if the MAILFROM is syntax correct, meaning has some characters, the at sign, some characters, a period, and some more characters

[Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test

2003-12-31 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
How come this does not fail the MAILFROM (envfrom) test? X-Declude-Sender: more [64.201.120.245] John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test

2003-12-31 Thread R. Scott Perry
How come this does not fail the MAILFROM (envfrom) test? X-Declude-Sender: more [64.201.120.245] Because Declude JunkMail automatically skips over usernames with no domains. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test

2003-12-31 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 11:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test How come this does not fail the MAILFROM (envfrom) test? X-Declude-Sender: more [64.201.120.245] Because Declude JunkMail

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test

2003-12-31 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Then how about a test to check if the MAILFROM is syntax correct, meaning has some characters, the at sign, some characters, a period, and some more characters? Seems to me that this would be appropriate to have as the default envfrom test behavior, with a LOOSENENVFROM ON option in

RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test

2003-12-31 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
, 2003 2:49 PM To: John Tolmachoff (Lists) Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] envfrom test Then how about a test to check if the MAILFROM is syntax correct, meaning has some characters, the at sign, some characters, a period, and some more characters? Seems to me that this would