RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread Goran Jovanovic
n > Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 1:23 PM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM > scores? > > I see; so it becomes non-authoritative on everything. Do you know what > the > difference is between the two r

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
abled recursion but didn't list forwarders? Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 10:10 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores? Don't configur

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread John T \(Lists\)
5 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores? > > That's what I was thinking. How do you configure the cache-only? > > Thanks, > > Ben > > - Original Message - > From: "John T

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
That's what I was thinking. How do you configure the cache-only? Thanks, Ben - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 1:59 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM sc

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread John T \(Lists\)
nd ye shall find!" > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IMail Admin > Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:20 AM > To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> There was some discussion about running a cache-only DNS server for > IMail/Declude. I didn't read most of the thread, and I never saw how > to make the DNS serve cache only, but I was thinking that if I had a > cache-only server that is only available to the mail server, then I > can leave o

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
"IMail Admin" Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 12:06 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores? That's when the JM scores got so high. I'm testing a different config now: allow recursion on the Forwarders tab, but disable it on the Adva

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread Sanford Whiteman
> That's when the JM scores got so high. I'm testing a different > config now: allow recursion on the Forwarders tab, but disable it on > the Advanced tab. I won't know if this works until I get some > messages. In the meanwhile, can anyone explain this to me? You _must_ allow recur

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-04-01 Thread IMail Admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:12 PM Subject: SPAM [16][Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores? Hi All, I was testing out our domain name at dnsreport.com, and it complained that we had recursion turn on at the DNS server. So I tried turn

[Declude.JunkMail] recursion turned off causes higher JM scores?

2006-03-31 Thread IMail Admin
Hi All, I was testing out our domain name at dnsreport.com, and it complained that we had recursion turn on at the DNS server. So I tried turning it off, and suddenly all our JM scores went through the roof. I've got a sample from some personal mail below. It looks to me like IPs weren't be