RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images

2003-03-10 Thread Markus Gufler
] ... Markus -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill B. Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 6:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images Scott, How about adding a test for if the text/html segment of an email

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images

2003-03-10 Thread Bill B.
I haven't tried SPAMCHK yet, but I've heard you guys talking about it on the list. Maybe I'll give it a try. Thanks -Original Message- From: Markus Gufler Sent: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 09:40:55 +0100 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images Hi Bill, If the email contains only

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images

2003-03-10 Thread Rick Davidson
Davidson Buckeye Internet Inc. www.buckeyeweb.com 440-953-1900 ext 222 - - Original Message - From: Bill B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 12:50 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images Scott, How about adding a test for if the text/html

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images

2003-03-10 Thread Aaron Moreau-Cook
Rick, Would you mind posting a copy of this file? Thanks much! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rick Davidson Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 12:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images I have had good luck

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spam w/ all images

2003-03-09 Thread R. Scott Perry
How about adding a test for if the text/html segment of an email contains all IMG tags, with no actual text? Seems like that sort of spam is getting more prevelent lately. We are looking at the possibility of (optionally) parsing HTML segments, which might end up allowing for this somehow (by