Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!

2010-01-22 Thread John T
John T eServices For You -Original Message- From: "Andy Schmidt" Sent 1/20/2010 6:50:16 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!A true WHITELIST would mean that: a) it could skip over all the other tests right f

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!

2010-01-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
al Message- From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Dean Lawrence Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 9:24 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF! Andy, Since there is already an SPF Pass, Fail, and Neut

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!

2010-01-20 Thread Dean Lawrence
Andy, Since there is already an SPF Pass, Fail, and Neutral result, couldn't you just create a rule that if the sender passes SPF that you apply a large negative point value? Then you could apply that rule to only the domains that you want to whitelist. Dean On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Andy

[Declude.JunkMail] Conditional Whitelist - Good Use of SPF!

2010-01-20 Thread Andy Schmidt
Hi, Despite all the shortcomings of SPF, there may be one GOOD use: Every once in a while I receive requests to whitelist certain sender email addresses or domains - then I explain that we don't like to do that because it would allow any spam that PRETENDS to come from that domain to pass.