RE: [Declude.JunkMail] APEWS test results

2007-08-31 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
FYI, both SORBS and UCEPROTECT stopped mirroring APEWS due to the low quality of the list. Also, the SANS ISC recently diarized an issue with the APEWS using one of their sources in a manner they do not recommend: http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=3189 Andrew. _

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] APEWS

2007-06-13 Thread Kevin Bilbee
Be careful there level 2 list blocks /9 ranges. Like 12.0.0.0/9 this is AT&T Kevin From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:00 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] APEWS They

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] APEWS

2007-06-13 Thread Scott Fisher
They seem to have pretty good hit rates at http://www.sdsc.edu/~jeff/spam/cbc.html especially the rhsbl Looks like I need to look at the pbl.spamhaus.org again. Those numbers are up pretty good too. That's the beauty of Declude in my opinion, I can add these lists at a low weight and see how t

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] APEWS

2007-06-12 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
It looks and reads exactly the same as some previous list that I've forgotten about. I haven't tried it... Andrew. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Bilbee Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 4:51 PM To: