ginal Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted?
I am missing the thought process.
Why is counterweighting by a large number so much better than whitelisting
if both achieve the same purpose?
L PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted?
We've found that to be too general... You might try a regex or
phrase-based
whitelist that looks for unique text in the newsletter to whitelist it
(or
rather counterwe
Tyler Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 7:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted?
Try
Whitelist from @returns.bulk.yahoo.com
Or
Whitelist from @yahoo-inc.com
I have one of these to allow fantasy football and baseball emails th
ay, November 03, 2005 7:01 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Address Not Whitelisted?
Try
Whitelist from @returns.bulk.yahoo.com
Or
Whitelist from @yahoo-inc.com
I have one of these to allow fantasy football and baseball emails through to
my franchisees. I have not seen any spam whitelisted
Cavell,
Whitelisting works off of the "X-Declude-Sender" field and not the from
field. In this case you want to whitelist "@returns.bulk.yahoo.com"
although in the header below it appears to be somewhat cut off.
Darrell
---
invURIBL - Intelligent URI F
Try
Whitelist from @returns.bulk.yahoo.com
Or
Whitelist from @yahoo-inc.com
I have one of these to allow fantasy football and baseball emails through to
my franchisees. I have not seen any spam whitelisted because of this setup
and I have been using it for at least a year. It may not be the
