RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bonded senders

2004-03-10 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, is there a way of WHITELISTING a positive BONDEDSENDER? Like you do with HABEAS? You should be able to do that with the latest beta and a filter, using a line "TESTSFAILED WHITELIST CONTAINS BONDEDSENDER" in your filter file. -Scott --- D

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Bonded senders

2004-03-10 Thread Lyndon Eaton
The concept behind BONDEDSENDER seems to be the same as HABEAS. But if I understand things correctly, Declude can not treat the two in the same way. To use HABEAS headers you simply enter WHITELIST HABEAS in the global.cfg. And by using this an email could fail every rule you have (but pass the HA

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bonded senders

2004-03-09 Thread Dan Geiser
Paul, Here's what Cyan said about a month ago... - From: "Cyan Callihan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 13:19:07 -0800 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BONDEDSENDER, spam hit on Virtumundo Please send all of your complaints...to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will investi

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Bonded senders

2004-02-20 Thread Matt
I was hoping that someone else would answer this since I've been a bit down on Bonded Sender lately for their practice of allowing some spammers on their system and other things. Regardless, this isn't the fault of Bonded Sender, you are scanning on multiple hops and the spammer forged the head