Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-03-03 Thread Matt
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 8:18 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Erik, I don't doubt the possibility of a bug causing the scanning of such a messa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-03-03 Thread Erik
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colbeck, AndrewSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:34 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Ditto. I've received and held 24 messages wit

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-03-02 Thread Agid, Corby
We too are receiving these.Upgrading to version 4 did not fix the problem. Declude is scanning them, but then the headers are inserted at the END of the message. Most email readers won't show those "headers". However, if you are using iMail you can open the .mbx file (located on the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Were getting the same.  Also using Declude with smartermail.  Because Declude doesnt appear to be scanning the headers there is no way for us to stop them. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:38 AM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Erik
-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave BeckstromSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 6:41 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comCc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Were getting the same. Also using Declude with

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Matt
TED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Were getting the same. Also using Declude with smartermail. Because Declude doesnt appear to be scanning the headers there is no way for us to stop them. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mai

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Harry Vanderzand
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ErikSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:49 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files The problem that we've seen this "spammer" is that the image is corrupted as you mentioned... a

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
VanderzandSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:10 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Judgement is quick to pass for some around here. These are getting caught by my system X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: SBL [28], SORBS-DUHL [4

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Erik
nal Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, AndrewSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:34 PMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Ditto. I've received and held 24 messages with the same

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Gary Steiner
, 2006 1:53 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Yes, they are passing SNIFFER and Darrell's INV-URIBL at this time. But what Evans wrote is true. Either this spammer has corrected his image.. the fact remains that in the past when

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Matt
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Ditto. I've received and held 24 messages with the same title. Re-queuing 3 of these to myself, they had an image that was intact. They fail the usual RBL tests plus Message Sniffe

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ErikSent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 10:51 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Yes, they are passing SNIFFER and Darrell's INV-URIBL at this time. But what Evans wrote is true. Either this &qu

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
www.handynetworks.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 2:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Interesting. As Matt, said, if you can get an original D

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Bill Landry
. Bill - Original Message - From: Gary Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 11:06 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files I received a couple with the broken gif as late as yesterday. The Declude headers end up

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Matt
| Fax: 888-300-2FAX www.handynetworks.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colbeck, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 2:54 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Interesting. As Matt

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Dave Beckstrom
Title: Message Are you utilizing smartermail as your mail server? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harry Vanderzand Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 12:10 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files

2006-02-28 Thread Gary Steiner
announced anywhere. Original Message From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 3:07 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Damaged Image Files Gary, you should upgrade to 3.0.6, which has been out for about a week