: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
But who wants 800MB to 1GB spam log files?
The server is so busy doing declude processes there isn't enough time to
run
a log analyzer on the local machine.
It takes to long to transfer the log file to a different machine.
Robert
Hi,
Does anybody know if there is a newer version of Delog or another program
that can analyze the declude log files?
I use DLAnalyzer (www.DLAnalyzer.com) with great success.
Here a few snippets from reports that I schedule daily:
Last Action Report Using Action: DELETE, HOLD,
Scott,
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID
in my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Aaron
On Jun 1, 2004, at 9:01 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
I noticed after I upgraded to Declude 1.79, Delog 1.08b is no longer
able to
calculate the number of failed
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID in
my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Do you have the Msg failed lines in your log file? If not, then you
should go to LOGLEVEL HIGH.
-Scott
---
Declude
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
I've noticed the logging problem as well and I do have LOGLEVEL MID
in my global.cfg.
That doesn't resolve the issue.
Do you have the Msg failed lines in your log file? If not, then you
should go to LOGLEVEL
Perry
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
Did the Msg Failed line under LOGLEVEL MID to report the
individual line numbers that it failed in a filter test get moved to
HIGH?
With v1.78 and earlier
Thanks, we have been running along with MID since the beginning,
all along, upgrading the interim releases. We just this week needed to
know which line it failed on in one of our filter files. This is what
we get now in our log. I will up to HIGH this week. Thanks,
Qff4f4d2301429a89
Scott,
Changing to Loglevel High seems to have added the Msg Failed lines to
the log.
I run delog at the end of the day and see what the results are, but I'm
pretty sure it works now.
Thanks,
Aaron
On Jun 1, 2004, at 10:16 AM, R. Scott Perry wrote:
Did the Msg Failed line under
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude version 1.79 and Delog
Thanks, we have been running along with MID since the beginning,
all along, upgrading the interim releases. We just this week needed to
know which line
But who wants 800MB to 1GB spam log files?
The server is so busy doing declude processes there isn't enough time to
run
a log analyzer on the local machine.
It takes to long to transfer the log file to a different machine.
Once a week, I zip the previous weeks logs, ftp them to my
10 matches
Mail list logo
