RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-05 Thread David Stavert
] Encoded Email... how? You could create a filter that looks for these types of links. If there is NOT a http://x.x.x.x regular expression then it would most likely be spam. FWIW, here's how you create them: To convert an IP to integer: Note that the % is the standard C arithmetic operator ((2^24

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-05 Thread Mark Smith
LOL! Declude doesn't have a filter for that. :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Stavert Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how? Mark Any

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
This one has me baffled. This email (spam) showed up as what appeared to be an html formatted message. When I view the raw message it appears as an encoded attachment making it impossible to filter on any body content. How are they doing it and how do we stop it? That's getting to be a more

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-04 Thread Kami Razvan
We are actually finding more more SPAM are coming that way. We are only catching them when they put interesting words in the subject. Also what we are finding is they are turning the links and addresses into binary numbers, therefore making it impossible to detect the links and trap them...

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-04 Thread Madscientist
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how? | | | | This one has me baffled. This email (spam) showed up as what | appeared | to be an html formatted message. When I view the raw message | it appears | as an encoded attachment making it impossible

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-04 Thread Rick Davidson
: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how? This one has me baffled. This email (spam) showed up as what appeared to be an html formatted message. When I view the raw message it appears as an encoded attachment making it impossible to filter on any body content. How are they doing it and how do we

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-04 Thread Madscientist
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how? | | | We are actually finding more more SPAM are coming that way. | We are only catching them when they put interesting words in | the subject. | | Also what we are finding is they are turning the links

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm not an expert, but it may be that this started as a way to encode languages containing Unicode into RFC-compliant messages. When I created my own text kill filters for this it caught some E-mails that looked legitimate to a business that did foreign correspondance (I didn't decode or

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Encoded Email... how?

2002-09-04 Thread John Tolmachoff
Also what we are finding is they are turning the links and addresses into binary numbers, therefore making it impossible to detect the links and trap them... Such as majority of porn-sites. We get links like: http://0111010101010101010101010101010... FYI: Scott, or rather Declude, has a