Steiner
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 2:27 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question
Have you tried DLanalyzer?
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/
There is a free version that you can use for evaluation.
Original Message
From
Hi Karl,
Unfortunately not, we don't count emails other than in the console.txt file
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS -
Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 8:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question
Hi Karl,
Unfortunately not, we don't count emails other than in the console.txt
file
David
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS -
Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Sent: Wednesday, March 21
@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question
Oh well, didn't think there was. I just wanted to get a statistical
sampling of what I was deleting.
Karl Drugge
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David
Scott,
Am I coorect to assume ANYWHERE CONTAINS is the most expensive filter to run?
[In lieu of having separate SUBJECT CONTAINS and BODY CONTAINS I have been using
ANYWHERE CONTAINS.]
-Nick Hayer
-- Original Message --
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL
Am I coorect to assume ANYWHERE CONTAINS is the most expensive filter to run?
Correct.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver
I am adding filter files in slowly to my Declude setup. I now have added
filter tests that are scanning the body of emails. I have noticed a
significant increase in CPU spikes.
That will happen if you have a lot of BODY filters. For example, if you
have 1,000 BODY filters, Declude JunkMail
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question.
I am adding filter files in slowly to my Declude setup. I
now have added
filter tests that are scanning the body of emails. I have noticed a
significant increase in CPU spikes.
That will happen if you have a lot of BODY
Thank you. Another question - which filtering tests use the most amount of
CPU?
The combination of BODY CONTAINS or HEADERS CONTAINS (such as BODY 5
CONTAINS ThatDrugThatBeginsWithTheLetterV) are the only ones that will
normally cause high CPU usage. Others can, by would require many more
Chuck,
There are several different general uses for custom filtering. The
Matt's School of Thought would teach as follows:
1) Programmatic filtering. This is more like pattern matching with
custom filters. Patterns can be as simple as the country of origin, or
more complex like gibberish
Matt:
Thanks for your insight. I have been trying for two years to get in Front of the Spam
curve but have found it to be an ever changing landscape which is hard to stay on top
of. We have seen our Spam load increase at least 10 fold in the past two years. The
challenge is that we have
If I want to add two words into a single filter rule how do I do this?
For example:
BODY10 CONTAINSrobert allen
I'm assuming that the space would confuse the rule.
Actually, that will work (the only problem is that spaces before/after the
filter text won't be used, but they
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question
|
|
|
| If I want to add two words into a single filter rule how do
| I do this?
|
| For example:
|
| BODY10 CONTAINSrobert allen
|
| I'm assuming that the space would confuse the rule.
|
| Actually
Is it possible to enclose phrases in quotes for these filters?
robert allen
If not can this be a feature request?
It's already in the suggestion database. :)
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from
14 matches
Mail list logo
