Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header question

2003-12-01 Thread David Barrett
http://atriks.com/email_deployment.htm Seen quite a few of them. Yet to figure the company out though. Seems like a great place for spammers to hang out ... Dave - Original Message - From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header question

2003-12-01 Thread Dave Doherty
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:25 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header question http://atriks.com/email_deployment.htm Seen quite a few of them. Yet to figure the company out though. Seems like a great place for spammers to hang out ... Dave

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header question

2003-12-01 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header question Sounds to me like a good phrase to base a rule on. I read the explanation there. Fascinating reading, folks! Is there a test we can use to detect Atriks in the headers, or do we

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Header question: X-Accutrak:

2003-09-12 Thread brian
I haven't seen any spam. Walmart uses this for their newsletters, don't know about others. We negative weight this already. Brian On 09/12/03 10:10am you wrote... When ever I see this in the header, it is associated with a legit newsletter. Any one see the same, or see spam with this header?