Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Joe Job Filters

2004-11-08 Thread Matt
Scott Fisher wrote: The Earthlink and Spamarrest filters are the most annoying. I almost want to reply to them so they get the original spam I sometimes do that :) Matt -- = MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Joe Job Filters

2004-11-08 Thread Scott Fisher
Thanks for the responses.   Since my e-mail account is one of the two being joe-jobbed, I've got lots of samples to look at... I'll document how I attacked the problem for the mailing archive:   The spammer sends out thee subject base64 encoded (Subject: =?iso-8859-1?B?). It also will forge t

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Joe Job Filters

2004-11-05 Thread Matt
I use a combo test for this.  One test identifies various forms of null senders (there is more than just <> MAILFROM's due to common customizations so I also include things like postmaster@, mailer-daemon@, null@, noreply@, etc.).  The other test has an END statement for TESTSFAILED NOTCONTAINS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Joe Job Filters

2004-11-05 Thread Markus Gufler
There are 3 different type of NDR's caused by joe jobs.   All 3 are comming back not from spammy servers but from legit servers bouncing spam messages with wrong recipient addresses. (so far nothing new)   I've identified the following 3 types   a.) NDR with the part of the original spam mess