RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
ECTED] On Behalf Of Matt > Robertson > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > > Keith wrote: > >I plugged pink contracts into Google and here's the first link that > came up... >

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
D] 1-888-395-4678 |Ext. 101 972-889-0201 |Ext. 101 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt > Robertson > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:01 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Matt Robertson
Keith wrote: >I plugged pink contracts into Google and here's the first link that came up... Well, doesn't that just suck? Hopefully the 2001 date on that post is indicative of a changed landscape, otherwise they're pretty much *all* in league with the devil.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Keith Purtell
l and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Matt Robertson > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 12:25 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > &

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Matt Robertson
Phillip wrote: > Two words: pink contracts 9 syllables: what the heck are you talking about? I've had nightmares setting up PacBell/SBC DSL that would fill a book, but that was incompetent tech installation and support. Once the service is up its always been just great; for years running. And b

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
Two words: pink contracts > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd > - Smart Mail > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 7:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > > &

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Todd - Smart Mail
PROTECTED] > 1-888-395-4678 |Ext. 101 > 972-889-0201 |Ext. 101 > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Matthew Bramble > > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
Absolutely agreed. pbh > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matthew Bramble > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > > Don

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
ce Partner http://www.mediares.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1-888-395-4678 |Ext. 101 972-889-0201 |Ext. 101 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Bramble Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPA

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matthew Bramble > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > > .8 is one of those F-U blacklists that punishes every user on > a system > because a network administrator sa

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Matt Robertson
Keith wrote: >Would you post your configuration that works for you? and anyone else >that's willing to do so? I'd like to see some examples of successful >configurations to learn from. Here's mine. Weights 0-12 are OK, weights 13-19 get bounced and 20+ gets deleted. Neither bounces nor deletes

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-02 Thread Matthew Bramble
.8 is one of those F-U blacklists that punishes every user on a system because a network administrator saw fit to complain. I would think that most of these organizations are bandwidth providers with some sort of firewall that got tripped by the testing. Spammers don't rely on open relays in

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-01 Thread Keith Anderson
Would you post your configuration that works for you? and anyone else that's willing to do so? I'd like to see some examples of successful configurations to learn from. Thanks > Either way with declude there is not reason to directly block anything > just use a weighted system where each test

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-01 Thread Mark Smith
Cox cable I'll bet. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Harvy > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 6:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > > Who

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-01 Thread Eje Gustafsson
If someone demands they not get listed then they deserve to get blacklisted because OBVIOUSLY they have something to hide. .6 is List of hosts that have been noted as sending spam/UCE/UBE to the admins of SORBS. This zone also contains netblocks of spam supporting service provid

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-01 Thread Bill Landry
http://www.cox.com/ Bill - Original Message - From: "Glen Harvy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 3:12 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > Who's Cox? > > > -Original Message- > &g

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-01 Thread Glen Harvy
Who's Cox? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Smart Business > Lists > Sent: Tuesday, 2 September 2003 07:57 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > > Careful on SORBS-SPAM - blocking some large providers - Co

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM

2003-09-01 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
Yes..do not block on 127.0.0.6 and .8 pbh > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Smart Business Lists > Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 4:57 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SORBS-SPAM > > > Careful on SORBS