RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months

2005-02-11 Thread Markus Gufler
? Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus GuflerSent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:56 AMTo: Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Hi Scott, great stat's ! A question about SNIFFER

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months

2005-02-11 Thread R. Scott Perry
I've send this message over 46 hours ago. It's only me to receive it on the list so late? I fear if this happens repeatedly an effective discussion is not more possible. Back to snail-mail? Our mailserver received millions of E-mails over the past few days. Once we detected the problem

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months

2005-02-08 Thread Scott Fisher
Although I dislike the term, ham to me is legit e-mail. - Original Message - From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 5:13 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months No, I mean what does Ham mean? Does Ham mean

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months

2005-02-07 Thread Dan Geiser
Scott, How do you define Ham? Thanks, Dan - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:14 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months I've compiled my spam test results over the last year to look

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months

2005-02-07 Thread Scott Fisher
: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Scott, How do you define Ham? Thanks, Dan - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:14 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months I've compiled my spam

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months

2005-02-07 Thread Dan Geiser
, 2005 5:32 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months My weighting system is this: 100 No action (27.7% of all mail in Jan 2005) 100 Subject tag (.5% of all mail) (1/3 of this weight range tend to be spam) 200 Hold (.5% of all mail) (I average 1 a month of Ham in hold) 300

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests

2004-08-04 Thread Jeff Maze
Looks like SpamAssassin to me.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott MacLean Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 1:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests I received a forwarded email with these headers today.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests

2004-08-04 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
Definitely SpamAssassin. If you want these tests and more, check out the signature at the bottom of one of Sanford Whiteman's recent posts. Andrew 8) -Original Message- From: Scott MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]