I've send this message over 46 hours ago. It's only me to receive it on
the list so late?
I fear if this happens repeatedly an effective discussion is not more
possible. Back to snail-mail?
Our mailserver received millions of E-mails over the past few days. Once
we detected the problem yester
k to snail-mail?
Markus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus
GuflerSent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:56 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam
tests by months
Hi Scott,
great stat's !
A
Hi Scott,
great stat's !
A question about SNIFFER
It seems you have a much longer list of different SNIFFER
return codes then I
Is there somewhere a complete list?
Markus
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
FisherSent: Monday, February 0
Although I dislike the term, ham to me is legit e-mail.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 5:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months
No, I mean what does Ham mean? Does Ham mean legit e-m
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months
>
>
> > Scott,
> > How do you define Ham?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> > -
rew the line at 200. Everything held
or deleted is considered spam.
Everything under 200 is considered ham, I think this is fairly conservative.
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Geiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Junk
Scott,
How do you define Ham?
Thanks,
Dan
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months
I've compiled my spam test results over the last year to look at test
effectiveness tren
