Title: Message
Make that definitely.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Mark SmithSent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 7:08
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[Declude.JunkMail] Spammers getting smarter?
They're probably
? Accurate enough to go with weight
10?
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From:
R. Scott
Perry
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 6:13
PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammers
getting smarter?
Some ideas on going to the next
level:a)give
Yes, I've gotten several spams that didn't fail any
tests. I've added some to my blacklist test, but I doubt that will do much
good in the end.
Glenn Z.
- Original Message -
From:
Mark
Smith
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 5:50
PM
Yup. I don't bother with a blacklist as these clowns are always one step ahead of me
in this regard. Gave up on blacklisting domains long ago.
Some ideas on going to the next level:
a)give the SpamCop test a weight heavy enough to fail a message on its own. Imperfect
at best.
b) use
: Matt Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spammers getting smarter?
Yup. I don't bother with a blacklist as these clowns are always one step
ahead of me in this regard. Gave up on blacklisting domains long ago
]
Spammers getting smarter?
They're probably monitoring this list server. :)
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn \
WCNetSent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 6:54 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
