Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update

2005-02-04 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
I'm still running 1.81 and don't plan on changing that until all this ruckus gets settled down. :-) - Original Message - From: Ralph Krausse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:11 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update

2005-02-04 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
Thank you for the update. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ralph Krausse Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 2:11 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject:

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update

2005-02-04 Thread Scott Fisher
] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update I'm still running 1.81 and don't plan on changing that until all this ruckus gets settled down. :-) - Original Message - From: Ralph Krausse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:11 PM Subject

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update

2005-02-04 Thread Glenn \\ WCNet
I have that test disabled for the duration. - Original Message - From: Scott Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 4:50 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Subject: Declude 2.0 Update I'd upgrade to 1.82 if you use the spamheaders