RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea

2006-09-04 Thread John T \(Lists\)
IL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 8:15 AM > To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea > > I ran a query on this looking at my August email results (228889 emails): > > Excluding HELOBOGUS > Excl

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea

2006-09-04 Thread Markus Gufler
> To: declude.junkmail@declude.com > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea > > I ran a query on this looking at my August email results > (228889 emails): > > Excluding HELOBOGUS > Excluding (timeout) and [No Reverse DNS] and (Private IP) > Looking at last 4 char

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea

2006-09-04 Thread Scott Fisher
I ran a query on this looking at my August email results (228889 emails): Excluding HELOBOGUS Excluding (timeout) and [No Reverse DNS] and (Private IP) Looking at last 4 chars of helo <> last 4 chars of revdns 1487 ham: including gov / us mismatches a fair amount of .com / .org with DSL / CABLE

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea

2006-09-04 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
1 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea > If email failed HELOBOGUS or NOREVDNS (or other specified > tests) END otherwise compare the last 3 characters of the > HELO with the last 3 characters of the REVDNS and if not > match add say 1/5 or so of HOLD weight. Hmm John, I consider it a go

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Test idea

2006-09-03 Thread Markus Gufler
> If email failed HELOBOGUS or NOREVDNS (or other specified > tests) END otherwise compare the last 3 characters of the > HELO with the last 3 characters of the REVDNS and if not > match add say 1/5 or so of HOLD weight. Hmm John, I consider it a good idea. As I can remember I suggested it arro