Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weights not properly adding up?

2005-09-07 Thread Matt
Kevin, In a standard setup, when you don't see NOLEGITCONTENT or IPNOTINMX in the failed tests shown in the headers, that means that they did credit weight. It causes a lot of confusion until people figure this out. Just convince yourself that this is the case and move forward on that assum

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weights

2004-04-13 Thread Joe Raykiewicz
Thanks, would you mind sharing your weights? - Original Message - From: "Scott Fisher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:53 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weights I only use weighting. I mark the subject line as spa

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Weights

2004-04-13 Thread Scott Fisher
I only use weighting. I mark the subject line as spam at 20 and hold the e-mail at 35 (hope to lower this to 30). These numbers are really subject to what you weigh your tests at. No single test can cause me to hit 20. I do have a couple of 12's that would combine to over 20 but they are differe

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] weights

2003-07-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm having trouble understanding the weights in favor of the other tests. The easiest way to understand is to realize that the weight tests act like all the other tests. If you have an email that say spamcop is blocking and have that set to warn in the junkmail file, also it is listed in relays

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Weights

2002-11-22 Thread John Tolmachoff
If you define a test with a weight, that weight will be added to any message it fails. In your example, BHOLE-ARGENTINA IGNORE only describes and action for Declude to take if it fails the test.   If you want to specify an action, you will have to leave the weight at zero.   John Tol