ehalf Of Darin
CoxSent: Monday, October 04, 2004 4:32 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
annoying spammer
Good idea.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:17 AM
Su
One warning,
I've received legit non-spam e-mail from 204.96.122.157 within September.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying spamme
- Original Message -
From: Matt
> You must have missed my reply late last night due to spam blocking
> of a domain in the message.
Hmmm, maybe so, because I never saw your message from last night (I'll check
my hold queue).
> Please note that your blocks are off, in fact the first two t
Bill,
You must have missed my reply late last night due to spam blocking of a
domain in the message. Please note that your blocks are off, in fact
the first two that you listed include two class B's each (131,072 IP's
each), while their largest block is a /18 which contains 16,384
addresses.
PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer
> Message- Original Message -
> From: Richard Farris
>
> > I am seeing a lot of these in my spamreview alsocan't we just
> blacklist the domain..?
>
> Yo
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Farris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So putting these lines in my ipblacklist would work...
Yes, without the "REJECT" command, as this applies to my Postfix gateways
and not Declude JunkMail. For more detail, see my previous post for how to
use these netblo
- Original Message -
From: "Cody Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I see where we can exclude single ips in the badip.txt file. Can we do
> networks as well? If so - what's the syntax.
Yes, add something like the following to your global.cfg:
IPBLACKLIST ipfile C:\IMail\Declude\ipfile.txt
t: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer
Message- Original Message -
From: Richard Farris
I am seeing a lot of these in my spamreview alsocan't we just
blacklist the domain..?
You could, but they use so many different domains if cou
D] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer
Message- Original Message -
From: Richard Farris
> I am seeing a lot of these in my spamreview alsocan't we just
blacklist the domain..?
Y
Message- Original Message -
From: Richard Farris
> I am seeing a lot of these in my spamreview alsocan't we just
blacklist the domain..?
You could, but they use so many different domains if could be tough to keep
up with them. I just block the netblocks that have been assigned to Ph
- against html mail
/\- against microsoft attachments
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Farris
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer
I am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:09
AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying
spammer
We
are seeing the same thing. They are not tripping sniffer, we are only
catching them because of Mailpolice bulk.
They
seem to be all originating from
Title: Message
We are
seeing the same thing. They are not tripping sniffer, we are only catching
them because of Mailpolice bulk.
They
seem to be all originating from Alpha Internet services out of Houston
Texas.
We are
blocking a /20 and a /18 block.
Chuck SchickWarp 8,
Inc.(3
Good idea.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Markus Gufler
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer
Please consider also support for multiple/flexible hold
folders. Sometimes miracles just happens
October 04, 2004 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer
Yep a REAL annoying spammer. I'm putting the
Class Bs in hold as well as the first 2 or 3 letters of the domain names then
reviewing with Spam Review.
BTW.. didn't someone take over Spam Review?
lack/white lists, data extracted
from custom headers, and supports internal logging to accumulate stats on
potential additions to black/white lists.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: J Porter
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
Yep a REAL annoying spammer. I'm putting the
Class Bs in hold as well as the first 2 or 3 letters of the domain names then
reviewing with Spam Review.
BTW.. didn't someone take over Spam Review? Any new
versions available?
Dam... we shoulda been in the registrar biz and
collected the
> > On Monday, October 4, 2004, 12:22:30 AM, i360 wrote:
> >
> > iS> We have been swamped with spam from United Email Marketing.
> > iS> Below is a list of IP addresses and domains used to send the crap.
> >
> > iS> Sniffer does not catch them and I can't stop them.
> >
> > ??? I did some checking.
- Original Message -
From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Monday, October 4, 2004, 12:22:30 AM, i360 wrote:
>
> iS> We have been swamped with spam from United Email Marketing.
> iS> Below is a list of IP addresses and domains used to send the crap.
>
> iS> Sniffer does not catch
Blacklist them. They have attacked with three different large blocks
in the last 2 weeks. The address space is from an old provider that is
no longer around (phoenix.net), possibly hijacked, possibly just simply
delegated for use in spam.
204.120.224.0/19 Phoenix Data Systems/United Email
On Monday, October 4, 2004, 12:22:30 AM, i360 wrote:
iS> We have been swamped with spam from United Email Marketing.
iS> Below is a list of IP addresses and domains used to send the crap.
iS> Sniffer does not catch them and I can't stop them.
??? I did some checking.
We've had rules for most (al
21 matches
Mail list logo
