xyz.net
>@abc.comxyz.org
>
>Your list below should work just fine.
>
>Bill
>- Original Message -
>From: "Dan Patnode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:33 PM
>Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkM
work just fine.
>
>Bill
>- Original Message -
>From: "Dan Patnode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:33 PM
>Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
>
>
>So then these also won
no further down the list)
@abc.comxyz.net
@abc.comxyz.org
Your list below should work just fine.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Patnode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdom
dictionary words. So without the @ you will run the risk of matching unintended
domains such as "myaccountant.com", "business-in-asia.com"
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Dan Patnode
Sent: 06 Jun 2003 15:33:26 -0700
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdo
So then these also won't work:
@2die4.com outblaze.com
@accountant.com outblaze.com
@adexec.com outblaze.com
@africamail.com outblaze.com
@allergist.com outblaze.com
@alumnidirector.com outblaze.com
@archaeologist.com outblaze.com
@arcticmail.com outblaze.com
@artlover.com out
03 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
>
> >@tin.itTin.it
> >@tin.itTuttopmi.it
> >@tin.itFlexmail.it
> >
> >Scott, would you confirm?
>
> I'm not sure this will work.
>
> The problem is that when Declude JunkMail sees the lin
@tin.itTin.it
@tin.itTuttopmi.it
@tin.itFlexmail.it
Scott, would you confirm?
I'm not sure this will work.
The problem is that when Declude JunkMail sees the line "@tin.it Tin.it",
if the reverse DNS is "mail.Tuttopmi.it", Declude JunkMail will fail the
test (even though it matches
e.de t-online.com
>> wanadoo.fr
>>
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Andy Schmidt
>>
>> H&M Systems Software, Inc.
>> 600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
>> Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
>>
>> Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
, 2003 6:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
>
>
> Here two big international ones:
>
> t-online.de t-online.com
> wanadoo.fr
>
>
> Best Regards
> Andy Schmidt
>
> H&M Systems Software, Inc.
> 600 East
.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Landry
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 01:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Here is my list thus far:
amazon.com
aol.com
apple.com
att.
attbi.com
bellsouth
What if you had two lines:
msn.com hotmail.com
msn.com microsoft.com
It would NOT fail if it reversed to either hotmail or ms, correct?
Actually, it would fail in this case, since each line is processed
separately from the rest.
What if you had two lines:
msn.com hotmail.com
msn.com microsoft.com
It would NOT fail if it reversed to either hotmail or ms, correct?
Friday, May 30, 2003, 4:36:14 PM, R. Scott Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Msg failed SPAMDOMAINS (Spamdomain 'microsoft.com' found: Add
Yes 1.70.
Thanks, you understand my issue.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "Bill B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
> Are you running the latest beta (1.70)?
> Msg failed SPAMDOMAINS (Spamdomain 'microsoft.com' found: Address of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> sent from invalid [No Reverse DNS].). Action=WARN.
> Are you running the latest beta (1.70)? From the release notes, a REVDNS
timeout sould not cause SPAMDOMAINS to fail...
Thanks, you understand my iss
Thanks for the heads-up, Andy, I'll check it out...
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:38 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
> Bill,
>
> MX records
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
Sorry John.
I am questioning the validity of the test more then I am questioning you.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:16 PM
Sub
9:30 -0400
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
John,
In your list you your have: microsoft.com msn.com
How can we prevent this from happening. This is a good MS email but failed
the test.
Msg failed SPAMDOMAINS (Spamdomain 'microsoft.com' found: Address of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s
> Sorry John.
>
> I am questioning the validity of the test more then I am questioning you.
SOK. It has been a long week. I have got like zilch done today because half
the time I can not think. I think (Ouch) it is time to go back to sleep.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices
> 600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
> Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
>
> Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
> Fax:+1 201 934-9206
>
> http://www.HM-Software.com/
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beha
Sorry John.
I am questioning the validity of the test more then I am questioning you.
Fred
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamd
> John,
>
> In your list you your have: microsoft.com msn.com
Urgh, I can't win. It is not my list. Please people, read the entire post.
(Yes, I myself am guilty at times, so first admonishment is to me.)
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
-
- Original Message -
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
> > > If someone has a comprehensive spamdomains listing they are happy
> >
Perry"
Sent: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:53:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
>How about this?...is this format allowed in order to prevent
>"anythingmail.com" and "ihateyahoo.com" from matching:
>
>@mail.comoutblaze.com
>@yahoo.
Si
> > Does this mean if the address comes in as [EMAIL PROTECTED] - it's
> > rev DNS can be either earthlink.net or earthlink.com ??? and the other
> > way around if it's [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ?
>
> Exactly. Scott added this in 1.70.
Ah ok, that makes more sense to me now, and glad I was correct
> > > If someone has a comprehensive spamdomains listing they are happy
> > > with,could they post it for others to analyze/use?
> >
> >Uh, see the orginal post that started this thread.
>
> I would, except the list archives are still down.
Would not be in the archives even if they were up. This
However, you could use something like:
@mail.comoutblaze.com
@yahoo..yahoo.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains
300 IN A 63.108.110.20
;; Query time: 121 msec
;; SERVER: 204.189.38.2#53(204.189.38.2)
;; WHEN: Fri May 30 11:51:56 2003
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 116
==
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Schmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent:
How about this?...is this format allowed in order to prevent "anythingmail.com" and
"ihateyahoo.com" from matching:
@mail.comoutblaze.com
@yahoo.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: "R. Scott Perry"
Sent: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:06:11 -0400
Subject: Re: [Decl
How about this?...is this format allowed in order to prevent
"anythingmail.com" and "ihateyahoo.com" from matching:
@mail.comoutblaze.com
@yahoo.
Since reverse DNS entries won't have an "@" in them, only the first one
would work, and would require that mail from @mail.com have a reverse DNS
Bill,
You need to update:
excite.com excitenetwork.com
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
---
[This E-mail w
I am curious...
Would
Yahoo.
Not cover yahoo.com?
I guess one should just put yahoo.
Regards,
Kami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 1:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail
At 01:36 PM 5/30/2003, John Tolmachoff \(Lists\) wrote:
> If someone has a comprehensive spamdomains listing they are happy
> with,could they post it for others to analyze/use?
Uh, see the orginal post that started this thread.
I would, except the list archives are still down.
___
I am curious...
Would
Yahoo.
Not cover yahoo.com?
Yes, it would.
I guess one should just put yahoo.
That would work, too. A line with just "yahoo." would require that any
E-mail with a return address at *yahoo.* to have a reverse DNS entry that
includes *yahoo.*. That would include "[EMAIL
OK I am having trouble with the spam domains test. I just can not get my
brain to wrap it. Could someone try to give a concise detailed
explanation???
Kevin Bilbee
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill B.
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 7:2
Yes. but you should be able to put in
.mail.com outblaze.com
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "Bill B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 12:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
> Ah, so I assume a l
Ah, so I assume a line like this could cause problems then because it
would required that "anythingmail.com" must have either mail.com or
outblaze.com in their REVDNS. Is that correct?
mail.comoutblaze.com
Correct.
However, the potential problems with this are minimal, because if the
. .bellatlantic.
yahoo.com
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Scott MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
> If someone has a comprehensive spamdomains listing they are happy
t;
Sent: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:27:24 -0400
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
>I was under the impression that the spamdomains list could not include
>partial domains, such as "yahoo.". Scott, could you help out on this
>one?...are partial domain entries like thi
> If someone has a comprehensive spamdomains listing they are happy
> with,could they post it for others to analyze/use?
Uh, see the orginal post that started this thread.
John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
Engineer/Consultant
eServices For You
www.eservicesforyou.com
---
[This E-mail was scanned for vi
I was under the impression that the spamdomains list could not include
partial domains, such as "yahoo.". Scott, could you help out on this
one?...are partial domain entries like this allowed?
yahoo.yahoo.com
This will work fine.
For the SPAMDOMAINS test, you can have *anything* you want.
30 May 2003 07:36:00 -0700
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
One comment. Instead of having:
yahoo.com
yahoo.ca yahoo.com
yahoo.de yahoo.com
yahoo.dk yahoo.com
yahoo.es yahoo.com
yahoo.fr yahoo.com
yahoo.it yahoo.com
yahoo.no yahoo.com
yahoo.se yahoo.com
yahoo.co.jp yahoo.com
y
If someone has a comprehensive spamdomains listing they are happy
with,could they post it for others to analyze/use?
At 10:36 AM 5/30/2003, Bill Landry wrote:
One comment. Instead of having:
yahoo.com
yahoo.ca yahoo.com
yahoo.de yahoo.com
yahoo.dk yahoo.com
yahoo.es yahoo.com
yahoo.fr yahoo.co
TimeWarner AOL owns Netscape.
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
> > Attached is a list of spamdomains and their coresponding alias
This is new in the latest beta1.70b, and you are correct on your
assumption of how it works...
Jason
- Original Message -
From: "paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains li
Thanks Bill!
A very good list.
Now I'm interested if I can remove my blacklist containing the popular
domains.
Before I will check how many mails will fail POPULARDOMAINS _AND_
SPAMDOMAINS.
If there are a lot of hold spam from popular domains without failing the
SPAMDOMAINS-test this means that
nt: Fri, 30 May 2003 11:02:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list
> Attached is a list of spamdomains and their coresponding aliases that I've
compiled thus far. Anybody want to comment or expand upon this?
Please forgive my ignorance here, I have nearly every message
One comment. Instead of having:
yahoo.com
yahoo.ca yahoo.com
yahoo.de yahoo.com
yahoo.dk yahoo.com
yahoo.es yahoo.com
yahoo.fr yahoo.com
yahoo.it yahoo.com
yahoo.no yahoo.com
yahoo.se yahoo.com
yahoo.co.jp yahoo.com
yahoo.co.uk yahoo.com
yahoo.com.ar yahoo.com
yahoo.com.au yahoo.com
yahoo.com.br
Wait a second? When I requested this, was this format put in Declude?
earthlink.com earthlink.net
earthlink.net earthlink.com
email.itwebmessenger.it
excite.com excitenetwork.com
If so, I did not see this indicated in any messages I have read.
This was added to v1.70 -- you can e
email provided by netscape.net is at least partly based from AOL instant
messenger accounts, which partly correspond to some peoples' real aol.com
email addresses. when you do a full install of Netscape 6 and above, it
links w/ your AIM account for messaging, and provides you a *free*,
spammed
> Attached is a list of spamdomains and their coresponding aliases that I've
compiled thus far. Anybody want to comment or expand upon this?
Please forgive my ignorance here, I have nearly every message from this list
for the past 6 months on my machine, so I have looked, but missed it I
guess. A
Reply to: Bill B.
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] spamdomains list on Friday 9:20:04 AM
Wait a second? When I requested this, was this format put in Declude?
earthlink.com earthlink.net
earthlink.net earthlink.com
email.itwebmessenger.it
excite.com excitenetwork.com
If so, I did
51 matches
Mail list logo
