-UNSPEC-HIGH IP4Rlist.dnswl.org 127.0.10.3
-10 0
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott
Fisher
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting
/(there is another one too I think) in the test name.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 7:53 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] whitelisting/negative weights with DNSWL.org
-David
I think you messed up on all the ones with a 0 in the third octet.
I also chose to run it only on the last header. I wouldn't whitelist/credit
on any information on any previous headers
Ewww. Look at all the return codes!
I'd be interested in seeing some rates. Does it hit enough to work?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2007 6:42 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject:
I'll give it a try. Here's what I will use/
DNSWL-FINANCIAL-NONEdnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org
127.0.2.0 0 0
DNSWL-FINANCIAL-LOW dnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org
127.0.2.1 0 0
DNSWL-FINANCIAL-MEDIUM dnsbl %IP4R%.list.dnswl.org
127.0.2.2
