Tombe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 7:32 PM
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
Has anyone load tested Smartermail? It looks pretty good, but being
rather
new on the market and only showing smaller clients as their c
I've been
looking at MailMax as a potential iMail replacement).
- Wolf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Sullivan
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2004 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
nt: Monday, November 08, 2004 8:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
Holding off on SmarterMail here too and again need SQL DB with email account
info for our integrated member applications. Do you have a link to MailMax?
I am just as upset as others a
2004 11:38 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude/Smartermail
We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support
for it ):
J> Ditto! One more vote for SM.
Looks like we're going that route as well with our 2 (soon to be 3)
installations.
Really hope to be a
>> We're moving our installs to SM as well, hoping to see Declude support
>> for it ):
J> Ditto! One more vote for SM.
Looks like we're going that route as well with our 2 (soon to be 3)
installations.
Really hope to be able to take Declude with us. If not, will probably migrate
to MXGuard.
-
Hello Eric,
Monday, November 8, 2004, 9:30:42 AM, you wrote:
EK> What about SQL support in another product? I'd look at
EK> switching but the db storage is key to me. I rebuilt a machine
EK> after a crash and had imail back running with 100+ domains and
EK> 2000 users quickly with all the accou
