Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Request for Headers

2001-07-30 Thread John Fassbender
I appreciate it. I have all three of your products and think they are wonderful. Keep up the good work. Best regards, Johnmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello R., Monday, July 30, 2001, 8:20:27 PM, you wrote: >>I had the postmaster of an ISP request the headers of

Re: [Declude.Virus] Request for Headers

2001-07-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I had the postmaster of an ISP request the headers of the virus. I >was able to get them, but thought it might be nice if Declude could do >it automatically. > >Is it possible to have Declude automatically be able to send all the >header info? That isn't possible currently, but I have added th

[Declude.Virus] Request for Headers

2001-07-30 Thread John Fassbender
I had the postmaster of an ISP request the headers of the virus. I was able to get them, but thought it might be nice if Declude could do it automatically. Is it possible to have Declude automatically be able to send all the header info? Best regards, John mailto:[E

[Declude.Virus] Invalid final delivery

2001-07-30 Thread Bruno Carlos
With Declude I keep on getting mails from Postmaster saying Invalid final delivery userid: info@localhost Any explanation for this? Bruno Carlos This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.Viru

Re: [Declude.Virus] REVDNS:Has anyone used F-Prot...

2001-07-30 Thread Starfish Internet
I use it for workstations and it seems to do an excellent job.   David DanielsSystem AdministratorStarfish Internet Service[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Paul Ingram To: Declude. Virus Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 1:48 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] REVDNS:

Re: [Declude.Virus] REVDNS:Has anyone used F-Prot...

2001-07-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Does anyone use F-prot for workstations? >For $2 a system I thought it might be worth looking into. That's a good idea, especially since the minimum license is for 20 computers. So if you already license it to use with Declude Virus, you've got 19 extra licenses you can use. >Also if I go t

Re: [Declude.Virus] %virusname% and %virusfile%

2001-07-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I am running Declude with Netshield v4.5. (everything is working pretty >well too!) > >What I would like to do, is make use of these %virusname% and >%virusfile% options in the alert email that I am having sent to myself >when Declude finds a virus. You need to add "/REPORT report.txt" to the S

[Declude.Virus] %virusname% and %virusfile%

2001-07-30 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Good afternoon! Forgive me in advance for a question that I am sure has been answered before, but I'm new to the software and to the list. I am running Declude with Netshield v4.5. (everything is working pretty well too!) What I would like to do, is make use of these %virusname% and %virusfile%

[Declude.Virus] REVDNS:Has anyone used F-Prot...

2001-07-30 Thread Paul Ingram
Does anyone use F-prot for workstations? For $2 a system I thought it might be worth looking into. Also if I go to F-Prot on my servers should I use the on demand scanner or just the command line part? Paul Ingram IT Systems Analyst CI Travel 1.888.461.0022 Ext:826 [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

RE: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam

2001-07-30 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
OK.. I think you hit it Scott. The one that was missed, is the only one so far, that has come through with the .doc.com extension. Everything else has come with the .pif. My guess would be that Mcaffee saw the .doc extension and just quit scanning. Just goes to show that even with all the best/

RE: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam

2001-07-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
>Yes! I checked the log and everything seems to be working fine. The >email came through as "virus free", however, the day before Declude >nabbed it, and has been nabbing it. There's a chance that McAfee may not be recognizing it in certain forms. Virus scanners actually won't scan an entire f

Re: REVDNS:Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam

2001-07-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
>With the increase in virus activity during the last week maybe we reached >the MAXATONCE 4 and it didn't 'wait' for the 5th? That wouldn't be it. With the MAXATONCE setting, Declude will wait for other scanner processes to finish, and then it will scan the E-mail. You can check to se

RE: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam

2001-07-30 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Yes! I checked the log and everything seems to be working fine. The email came through as "virus free", however, the day before Declude nabbed it, and has been nabbing it. I'm not sure what Roger means by this.. We had one sneak in for the first time this last week as well. We know it happened b

RE: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam

2001-07-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
>I had one today sneak in..fortunately the user didn't recognize the >sender and was smart enough to delete the email. > >The Declude/McAfee setup has been catching this virus left and right. I >don't have a clue why all of a sudden it would let this one in. Did you check the log file to see if

REVDNS:Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam

2001-07-30 Thread Roger Heath
Reply to: Sharyn Schmidt Re: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam on Monday 7:52:49 AM We had one sneak in for the first time this last week as well. We know it happened because the header info identified it. With the increase in virus activity during the last week maybe we reached the MAXATONCE

RE: [Declude.Virus] OSDUL:sir cam

2001-07-30 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
I had one today sneak in..fortunately the user didn't recognize the sender and was smart enough to delete the email. The Declude/McAfee setup has been catching this virus left and right. I don't have a clue why all of a sudden it would let this one in. Sharyn Schmidt Network Specialist Florida D