Re: [Declude.Virus] .DOC identified as .EXE

2002-11-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
I'm going to check to see exactly what Declude Virus is doing in this case, to make sure that it is handling the situation properly. Actually, 1.63 will identify any filename mismatch as a problem, and convert it to an .exe. The next release will change that behavior to only catch filenames

[Declude.Virus] DSN:Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2002-11-27 Thread Don Hickey
Is there a link I can go to to get more information on this vulnerability? I installed 1.63beta this morning and two messages were caught with this vulnerability. I took a look at the messages and here is what happened. The user (using a macintosh and Netscape 4.74) forwarded the message (that

[Declude.Virus] Any problems eith the 1.63 so far?

2002-11-27 Thread Doug McKee
How is the new beta performing? Any problems? Thanks, Doug --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to

RE: [Declude.Virus] .DOC identified as .EXE

2002-11-27 Thread Bill Beach
For what it's worth, this happened here today too: 11/27/2002 12:19:11 Qfe8d396 MIME file: [text/html][7bit; Length=6927 Checksum=581128] 11/27/2002 12:19:11 Qfe8d396 Found file with mismatched extensions [Nov-Dec-Ja-Nov-Dec-Ja]; assuming .exe 11/27/2002 12:19:11 Qfe8d396 Got disp

RE: [Declude.Virus] .DOC identified as .EXE

2002-11-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
Scott, does this warrant a rollback or is a fix on its way out? John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the

Re: [Declude.Virus] DSN:Conflicting Encoding Vulnerability

2002-11-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a link I can go to to get more information on this vulnerability? No, it was just added to the 1.63 beta. It is designed to catch E-mails with a MIME segment that contain two different types of encoding (only one type of encoding can be used in a MIME segment). 1.63 may have false

RE: [Declude.Virus] .DOC identified as .EXE

2002-11-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
For what it's worth, this happened here today too: 11/27/2002 12:19:11 Qfe8d396 Found file with mismatched extensions [Nov-Dec-Ja-Nov-Dec-Ja]; assuming .exe It sounds it is probably the same issue (a broken mail client splitting the name in one location but not another, changing the actual

RE: [Declude.Virus] .DOC identified as .EXE

2002-11-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, does this warrant a rollback or is a fix on its way out? It only affects broken mail clients, so I personally don't see it as warranting a rollback. The interim release takes care of the issue. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus

RE: [Declude.Virus] Log Files

2002-11-27 Thread Doug McKee
My log files are still about 50Mb daily even after the LOG_OK NONE option. Is that version related? Thanks, Doug I have my logging set to LOW but my log files are still about 40-50Mb per day. We do process about 100K emails. What is the appropriate way to handle such a volume of info and not

RE: [Declude.Virus] Log Files

2002-11-27 Thread John Tolmachoff
How many e-mails are you processing and how many viruses are you catching? Can you post a snippet of the log? What is LOGLEVEL set to? Try setting to LOW. John Tolmachoff MCSE, CSSA IT Manager, Network Engineer RelianceSoft, Inc. Fullerton, CA 92835 www.reliancesoft.com -Original