[Declude.Virus] New release

2004-09-29 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: New release Hi, Due to a minor inconvenience called Hurricane Jeanne, we have been offline for about 5 days now. Can someone please tell me when the newest release was available for download? Thanks, Sharyn

Re: [Declude.Virus] New release

2004-09-29 Thread Darin Cox
Title: New release Hi Sharyn,   Looks like it was yesterday.   Our office just came back online yesterday afternoon as well.  Hope you didn't have much damage. Darin.     - Original Message - From: Sharyn Schmidt To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 9:04 AM Subj

RE: [Declude.Virus] New release

2004-09-29 Thread Jeff Maze
Declude Customers, Today we have released Declude Version 1.80 which is available to all customers with a Valid Service Agreement. Please log into your account www.declude.com/myaccount.asp to download the latest version of the software. Some of the most recent enhancements include: DECLUDE VIRU

[Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread marc catuogno
I had a JPG held by declude as: X-Declude-Virus: Detected [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability]. However, this was a JPG sent from one of my users to another. I seriously doubt it was infected with anything. The only thing was that it was sent from a MAC. User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
I had a JPG held by declude as: X-Declude-Virus: Detected [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability]. However, this was a JPG sent from one of my users to another. I seriously doubt it was infected with anything. The only thing was that it was sent from a MAC. User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread Markus Gufler
> I had a JPG held by declude as: > X-Declude-Virus: Detected [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability]. > > However, this was a JPG sent from one of my users to another. > I seriously doubt it was infected with anything. The only > thing was that it was sent from a MAC. After looking in t

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread Markus Gufler
For example there is a message showing up in the logfile as 09/29/2004 16:02:55 Qc07307e2007404eb [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability] 09/29/2004 16:02:55 Qc07307e2007404eb [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability] 09/29/2004 16:02:55 Qc07307e2007404eb [Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerabi

RE: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread marc catuogno
Thanks- Both jpgs held were sent by the same person - a graphic designer using a MAC. If that helps you change the code. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sub

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread Mike Wiegers
Sent a test message with jpg attached from Macintosh Entourage 11.0.0 (040405) and it was not caught. Mike --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL

Re: [Declude.Virus] New release

2004-09-29 Thread Greg Little
To keep it brief. Scott has a new JPEG test in Ver. 1.80, but it appears to still have a flaw. (Stopping a FEW normal JPEGs, mostly from MACs.) So, for the next few hours (days?), you can error on the side of caution or risk. But when it's fully ready, it's a must have update. Greg R. Scott

[Declude.Virus] Virusscan and jpeg detection -PANALYZE or not

2004-09-29 Thread Scott Fisher
An explanation of why some needed the switch and others may not have:   From: http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_128461.htm The 4395 DAT files no longer require that McAfee anti-virus products are configured to scan with program heuristics enabled to detect this threat.

Re: [Declude.Virus] GDI false Postive

2004-09-29 Thread Marc
I have found 5 false positives over the last 24 hours. Arrghh! 3 came from a local photographer sending photos to a local newspaper. FWIW, he was using an Apple. The other 2 came from a user receiving pic's from picturecd.kodak.com. -M - Original Message - From: marc catuogno To: [EMAIL

[Declude.Virus] Request for per-domain configuration

2004-09-29 Thread William Stillwell
From: David Sullivan Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.Virus] Request for per-domain configuration Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 11:37:11 -0800 DC> Hmmm...I hate having to turn off the footer for everyone just because of one DC> customers. Haven't run into it yet myself, but some people on this list DC> will p

[Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread Doug Anderson
Could someone please explain what this Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability is? Are all JPEG's vulnerable or just some with a bad format? The company I work for does a lot of graphics work and people email jpegs around. A few have been caught and I'm trying to understand why. I'm assuming (yes

RE: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread Donn Bly
The best writeup I have found so far is at http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topict3077.html BTW, while the bug is in the decoding of the jpeg files, the jpeg file can be renamed to a variety of extensions and still activate the vulnerability. As such, the following can be now considered

Re: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Could someone please explain what this Microsoft GDIPlus.DLL JPEG Vulnerability is? It is the most serious exploit ever discovered that viruses can use. Specifically, it allows viruses to spread in JPEG files, something nobody previously thought possible. Fortunately, it only can work on unpatch

RE: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread Peter Lowish
Scott Started to appear here in NZ now. We have just seen the first one sent by a local person to a recipient using our server It seems to me that if the PC is infected, that every jpg they send by email also contains the vulnerability - correct? Ta Peter -Original Message- From: [EMA

RE: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> That's because Microsoft screwed up, and gave out an algorithm for > detecting the exploit that has false positives. We plan to have full JPEG > analysis soon, to work around this (with absolutely no code from Microsoft > in it ). Scott, I have seen some false positives in files that were creat

RE: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I have seen some false positives in files that were created-what not on a PC, not on a MAC. Do you want a copy of these? No. I expect that our algorithm will work perfectly. -Scott --- Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution fo

RE: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread R. Scott Perry
It seems to me that if the PC is infected, that every jpg they send by email also contains the vulnerability - correct? It isn't yet known what viruses using this exploit may do. It might send out E-mails directly, attach itself as JPEG files to E-mails being sent out manually, etc.

RE: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
> >Scott, I have seen some false positives in files that were created-what not > >on a PC, not on a MAC. Do you want a copy of these? > > No. I expect that our algorithm will work perfectly. Shucks, too late. Just sent some to virus trap. ;) What is interesting on the ones I sent is the heade

Re: [Declude.Virus] JPEG Vulnerability

2004-09-29 Thread Doug Anderson
Ok... Declude virus does the detection. If a jpeg is attached/embedded in the email, the email will be flagged as having the vulnerability whether it's actually infected or not. Correct? If the sending pc, it's dll's, and software are updated with Microsoft's patch will the embedded jpg still