Correct but this only applies to SM 3.x
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary Steiner
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:53 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] reque slips by Declude?
So you a
So you are saying that the X is no longer needed? You just drop stuff in the
spool directory and Declude will ignore it? That in order for Declude to
rescan something it now has to be put in the proc directory?
Original Message
> From: "David Barker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
I Remove the x and place the files in the \proc directory.
David B
www.declude.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 7:59 AM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus]
With older versions of Declude and Smartermail you used to have to do the
"X" rename to skip Declude processing. If you left the "X" off it would be
rescanned by Declude.
However, now that Declude is intergrated into Smartermail v3 what is the
correct requeing process?
Darrell
-
Gary,
I do believe that messages that have been re-queued do not get scanned
a second time. If they did, you would never be able to re-queue
anything since it would be continually caught.
Dean
On 5/18/06, Gary Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Back on May 9 my server was hit by the Feebs viru
Back on May 9 my server was hit by the Feebs virus. I am using F-Prot, which
did not detect it. But I am using "BANEXT hta" which caught it.
Two days ago I upgraded to SmarterMail 3.1 and Declude 4.2.3. Among other
things, I've been looking at the addition of AVG to Declude. I noticed that
