Thanks Michael for the effort to 'splain! I appreciated it. Make sure you are
using the sanesecurity sigs as well as the MSRBL's
-Nick
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.com Tech Support
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574
Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net
General and
David -
At times like this its OK to sigh these emails: David "your pinata" Barker
:)
-Nick
From: "David Barker"
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 4:14 PM
To: declude.virus@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] Declude Virus inoperable for 13% of th
fyi -
Original Message
Subject: [clamav-announce] ClamAV/SOSDG 0.90.2-1 has been released!
(Security Fix)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 17:05:54 -0400
From: Brie Bruns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: The Summit Open Source Development Group
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
fyi -
Original Message
Subject: [clamav-announce] ClamAV/SOSDG For Windows 0.90.1-3 Is Now
Available
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 16:02:48 -0400
From: Bri Bruns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello all,
With help from various people, I've got a new build of
fyi -
Original Message
Subject: [clamav-announce] Problems with ClamAV/SOSDG For WIndows
0.90.1-1 and -2
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:20:20 -0400
From: Bri Bruns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Okay, been getting reports of people having problems with the 0
Exit code of 2 means ClamAV had an error - Is clamd running? will
clamdscan.exe work? eg no parameters?
-Nick
Gary Steiner wrote:
Ever since I upgraded to ClamAV 0.90.1-2 (the SOSDG windows port), I've been
unable to get it to work. The Declude log files show an error like this:
03/12/2007
Thanks David
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
FIX ZEROHOUR passing weight to SM when email WHITELISTED
FIX Ignore Case checking in Imail Address book 2006
FIX Improved performance when OUTBOUNDSPAMSCANNING OFF
FIX Updated CommTouch ZEROHOUR Dll
FIX EXITSCANONVIRUSDETECT ON works
Hi David,
What will this release contain?
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
We had scheduled a release for 31 January 2007, which we are delaying for
some changes next date is Monday 5 February 2007
Thanks
David Barker
Director of Product Management
Your Email security is our business
978.499.2933
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Also, for me to get the virus name I had to use the wrapper.
fyi - The names are otherwise recorded in the clamd.log
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsu
Failure I do believe, probably ClamD is not running?
-Nick
Markus Gufler wrote:
Does anyone know what exit codes ClamAV has and what they mean?
>From 2006-09-27 06:50PM on I can see a huge number of
"Virus scanner 2 reports exit code of 2"
...in the virus-logfile.
Markus
---
This E-mail
Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Pretty nice peice of social
engineering below - how many of your users will click on this tomorrow
:) Who can resist the temptation of a "secret" greeting card.
I get quite a few of these - here is my postcard-phish.txt
SKIPIFWEIGHT 26
REVDN
Mine is 9/8.
-Nick
Mark Reimer wrote:
What are the latest AVG
updates that everyone has? I’m
worried that my AVG stopped updating for some reason. Or is it from
Declude
moving all their stuff around?
Mark Reimer
IT Project Manager
American CareSource
214-596-2464
I have noticed now with 4x that if ClamAv is the first scanner it fails
- it cannot find the file to scan. However it it is moved to the 2
'hole' or 3 'hole' - identical config otherwise - it works like a charm.
Does any one else see this anomolie?
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declud
I just switched to 4x and noticed in the logs that scan times are
recorded -
here are some sample scan times against the same email -
2062ms Clamscan
468ms Mcafee scan.exe
171ms fprot
These relative scan time proportional differences appear to remain the
same against other emails.
Switching
n our two Linux
gateways for about a year now and thus far have had no problems with it.
Bill
- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] url file extensions
Bill,
Will you kindly ela
find!"
-Original
Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday,
April 11, 2006 1:09
PM
To:
Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: Re:
[Declude.Virus] url
file extensions
Hi John,
I was referring to file attachments that had a .url ext
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 12:10 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] url file extensions
I been asked to remove the block I have on these - and since I have
forgotten why I am blocking them Is
eServices For You
"Seek, and ye shall find!"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 12:10 PM
To: Declude.Virus@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.Virus] url file extensio
I been asked to remove the block I have on these - and since I have
forgotten why I am blocking them Is there a valid reason to block
these?
Thanks in advance
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type
Hi Mark,
Mark Reimer wrote:
After seeing Matt's response I'm curious what other users are using for
their F-prot switches.
here are mine:
SCANFILE1e:\Progra~1\FSI\F-Prot\fpcmd.exe /ARCHIVE=5 /DUMB /NOBOOT
/NOMEM /PACKED /SERVER /SILENT /TYPE /REPORT=report.txt
VIRUSCODE13
VIRUSCODE1
David Barker wrote:
The next release of Declude
which is currently being tested and soon to be released
ahh David - wanna share? What will the new ver have to offer? :)
-Nick
David B
www.declude.com
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
the tools can be used and
maybe will inspire others to create some cool scripts that they would
be willing to share with others on the list.
Bill
-
Original Message -
From:
Nick Hayer
Well I am grateful and frustrated at times- because it can do
so much
With these, you don't need to run CygWin ports or the Microsoft Windows Services for Unix. Bill Landry put the Declude and Message Sniffer mailing list users on to these a long time ago, and I'm still grateful to him.
Well I am grateful and frustrated at times- because it can do so much
Don Brown wrote:
#1 "The main benefit is that it cuts down on the amount of messages
virus scanned thus saving resources."
correct.
#2 "It still gets virus scanned."
only those emails that get past the junkmail scanning. If you do not
delete any junkmail then there is no benefi
David,
David Franco-Rocha wrote:
B) Your software is NEVER downgraded
for any reason, either automatically or otherwise
hmm - would you kindly shut down your key server for awhile and monitor
the list in the meantime?
-Nick
We have had a few reports from
customers who
Hi David,
Would you kindly elaborate on the ramifications of such a failure? I am
interested in when its fixed but more importantly its ramifications.
Are you saying that a hardware/network/software issue on your end can
in anyway disarm/defuse/alter/change the way Declude functions on its
in
Thanks for the info David!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
Declude 3.0.5.18
ALL - Fixed un-defined variables causing intermittent stop/start with the
decludeproc service.
JM - Fixed SmarterMail incoming email recipient domain aliases.
AV - Fixed un-defined variables, causing incorrect Virus Name
Matt has done this - it is in the Archives -
-Nick
John Carter wrote:
This raises a question(s): Has anyone done any real testing of which AVs
(in relation to Declude) perform the best, use the least resources, what is
the best scanning order, and how many to use (how many is too many and
Hi David,
Mcafee is one - the command line scanner is only $11 - if you can find a
vendor to sell it to you.
ClamAV is another choice and its free. I use it w/clamd.
http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/index.php
I use all three..
-Nick
David Dodell wrote:
After many years of using Virus Sta
Thanks David!
-Nick
David Barker wrote:
3.0.5.10 - Change was made to reset the winsock when the \proc directory
reached 0 messages
3.0.5.11 - Change was made to reset the winsock when the \proc directory
reached 0 messages and threads in the \work had completed processing
I will update docu
Well said Darin and I do agree totally -
-Nick.
Darin Cox wrote:
True... but it's not about Scott anymore. Declude is a larger company, with
more resources, and should be documenting this stuff... especially in light
of all of the issues trying to get a new version to market. This kind
Hi -
would anyone know what "Couldn't create map1" would mean in the Declude
virus log file?
Thanks!
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
a
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hi Nick:
I'm only repeating what I'm told - I don't have factual information on my
own.
. you are very funny at times!
Declude is supposed to check the /proc folder and ONLY go to sleep (for 30
seconds), if the folder contains no messages. On systems that have that
Hi Andy,
Andy Schmidt wrote:
Thanks Bill. I had gotten the impression as if everyone with dual-processor
system was reporting this and that people were still seeing it with the
latest version.
If you will would you let me know more about this issue. I haven't been
following exactly so I do
Hi Matt -
Matt wrote:
I was wrong about what was detecting it first...it was F-Prot. I just
figured out that my McAfee update script is no longer working. Does
anyone have a newer link to the daily DAT's than
http://download.nai.com/products/mcafee-avert/daily_dats/DailyDAT.zip.
T
Thanks Andrew!
-Nick
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Today is Microsoft Patch Tuesday for July 2005.
One of the bulletins is:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS05-036.mspx
Which fails to indicate which graphics formats are affected by this
vulnerability. It does mention that abus
- Original Message - From: "NIck Hayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] what does this mean in the virus log file?
Vulnerability flags = 76
Thanks!
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list.
Vulnerability flags = 76
Thanks!
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.Virus mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.Virus".The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
I am not real clear on this thread - but if it has to do with clamd -
it w/Declude no question has a problem in Windows. I have stopped using
it - it may take a week or even a month but it will crash...
-Nick
Terry Fritts wrote:
I can't find anything in the event or application logs
Title: Message
Hi Andy,
Colbeck, Andrew wrote:
Declude Virus will *not* detect abuse of MS05-16
with the Declude CLSID vulnerability detector.
They are entirely different animals, which
happen to have CLSID at their heart.
You are sure up to date with this stuff!
40 matches
Mail list logo
