[Declude.Virus] BANEXT question.....

2003-04-02 Thread paul
Scott. Is there a way to just refuse attachments of certain types? OR strip the attachment off? I don't want to bounce messages, I'd be happy with just removing the attachment. maybe add a line to the mail "Attachment removed" ? Is this possible? Or something we can add? Paul --- [This E-m

[Declude.Virus] BANEXT Question

2004-03-03 Thread Andy Ognenoff
I have a question about how DV handles BANEXT. Does DV scan the message first for viruses then check to see if an attachment is in the BANEXT list or does it check the BANEXT list and then scan the message, or does it check the BANEXT list and block based on that without scanning the message? A

[Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-07 Thread joe
I'm currently using: BANEXT EZIP, becuase BANEZIP ON does not work for me. I'm running the latest intrum version of Declude w/ F-Prot. I have a Standard Declude license. Does BANEZIP ON only work for the Pro version of Declude? If yes, I guess I should just continue to use BANEXT EZIP ? (Such a w

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question.....

2003-04-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
Is there a way to just refuse attachments of certain types? OR strip the attachment off? I don't want to bounce messages, I'd be happy with just removing the attachment. maybe add a line to the mail "Attachment removed" ? Is this possible? Or something we can add? No, that isn't possible. Al

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT Question

2004-03-03 Thread R. Scott Perry
I have a question about how DV handles BANEXT. Does DV scan the message first for viruses then check to see if an attachment is in the BANEXT list or does it check the BANEXT list and then scan the message, or does it check the BANEXT list and block based on that without scanning the message? The

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-07 Thread Don Hickey
ility detection. Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 7:22 PM Subject: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question > I'm currently using: BANEXT

RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-08 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
unday, March 07, 2004 5:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question > > I'm currently using: BANEXT EZIP, becuase BANEZIP ON does not work for > me. > I'm running the latest intrum version of Declude w/ F-Prot. I have a > Standard Declude

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:22 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question As Don said, there is no such thing as BANEXT EZIP. Try reading the archives again. John Tolmachoff Engineer/Consultant/Owner eServices For You > -Original Me

Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-08 Thread R. Scott Perry
No such thing as BANEXT EZIP?? I believe he meant "There is no such thing as BANEZIP ON" (because there isn't one of those). But Don re-posted the summary that I had sent out last week, which has all the details in it. -Scott --- Declude JunkM

RE: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question

2004-03-08 Thread John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
half Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 6:44 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.Virus] BANEXT question > > > >No such thing as BANEXT EZIP?? > > I believe he meant "There is no such thing as BANEZIP ON" (because there > isn'