[Declude.Virus] BankFraud (phishing) e-mails

2004-10-06 Thread Bill Landry
I just found that if you have "PRESCAN" set to on, you will not be able to catch these BankFraud/Phishing e-mails. However, if you set "PRESCAN" to "OFF", you can catch these if your virus scanner supports it. So far I have found that ClamAV, McAfee, and TrendMicro all support detection of these

Re: [Declude.Virus] BankFraud (phishing) e-mails

2004-10-06 Thread Matt
Bill, That's good information, thanks for sharing. From a practical standpoint, I would prefer to have the benefit of PRESCAN on my system, primarily because I estimate that about 1/2 to 2/3 of my CPU utilization is from virus scanning as is. It would be nice however if there was a piece of c

Re: [Declude.Virus] BankFraud (phishing) e-mails

2004-10-06 Thread Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])
://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. - Original Message - From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.Viru

Re: [Declude.Virus] BankFraud (phishing) e-mails

2004-10-07 Thread System Administrator
on 10/6/04 6:55 PM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Not to switch the subject, but what would be nice is the option not scan > with the other scanners once a virus is found... Than you can have scanners > that in general require less CPU like F-Prot versus Mcafee. Yes, I'd like that option!

Re: [Declude.Virus] BankFraud (phishing) e-mails

2004-10-07 Thread Nick
On 7 Oct 2004 at 6:54, System Administrator wrote: > on 10/6/04 6:55 PM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Not to switch the subject, but what would be nice is the option not > > scan with the other scanners once a virus is found... Than you can > > have scanners that in general require l