On 7 Oct 2004 at 6:54, System Administrator wrote:
> on 10/6/04 6:55 PM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Not to switch the subject, but what would be nice is the option not
> > scan with the other scanners once a virus is found... Than you can
> > have scanners that in general require l
on 10/6/04 6:55 PM, Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Not to switch the subject, but what would be nice is the option not scan
> with the other scanners once a virus is found... Than you can have scanners
> that in general require less CPU like F-Prot versus Mcafee.
Yes, I'd like that option!
://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And
Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log
Parsers.
- Original Message -
From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.Viru
Bill,
That's good information, thanks for sharing. From a practical
standpoint, I would prefer to have the benefit of PRESCAN on my system,
primarily because I estimate that about 1/2 to 2/3 of my CPU utilization
is from virus scanning as is. It would be nice however if there was a
piece of c
I just found that if you have "PRESCAN" set to on, you will not be able to
catch these BankFraud/Phishing e-mails. However, if you set "PRESCAN" to
"OFF", you can catch these if your virus scanner supports it. So far I have
found that ClamAV, McAfee, and TrendMicro all support detection of these
